AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision JUL172012_05B2203: Motions to reopen

AAO EB-1A decision JUL172012_05B2203: Motions to reopen

EB-1A motions to reopen — AAO decision JUL172012_05B2203: Motion to reopen dismissed; motion to reconsider dismissed; prior appeal dismissal affirmed.…

Decision summary: AAO decision JUL172012_05B2203: Motion to reopen dismissed; motion to reconsider dismissed; prior appeal dismissal affirmed. The review record does not provide a normalized explanation of the disposition. Consult the cited source pages.

Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.

Scope classification from review: in_scope_eb1a_decision_or_related_proceeding. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

JUL172012_05B2203

Decision date as printed

2012-07-17

Classification / field stated in source

Classification not stated in the normalized review fields

Procedural posture

AAO_posture: Combined motion to reopen and motion to reconsider following prior dismissal of an EB-1A appeal; the underlying appeal denial remained in force.; citation_pages: 2; 3; 4; 5; classification: Combined motion to reopen and motion to reconsider following prior dismissal of an EB-1A appeal; the underlying appeal denial remained in force.

Operative disposition

{'outcome': 'Motion to reopen dismissed; motion to reconsider dismissed; prior appeal dismissal affirmed.', 'basis': 'The AAO held the motions did not meet procedural requirements. The prior appeal had found awards, published material and leading/critical role unmet; high salary had been abandoned. Proposed new material was not shown to be previously unavailable, and the motion did not identify a legal or factual error. The opinion expressly treats final merits as a next step that would follow only if three criteria were established.', 'citation_pages': [2, 3, 4, 5, 6]}

Final-merits status

This is a procedural motion decision. The AAO says final merits would be the next step only if three criteria were established; that threshold was not met.

What the AAO decision addressed

The review record does not provide a normalized explanation of the disposition. Consult the cited source pages.

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

Not met — source PDF

Membership

Not considered — source PDF

Published material about the person

Not met — source PDF

Judging the work of others

Not considered — source PDF

Original contributions of major significance

Not considered — source PDF

Scholarly authorship

Not considered — source PDF

Artistic display or showcases

Not coded — source PDF

Leading or critical role

Not met — source PDF

High salary or remuneration

Abandoned or waived — source PDF

Commercial success in the performing arts

Not considered — source PDF

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: {'eligible_for_narrow_comparison': True, 'fit': 'Procedural comparison on motions to reopen/reconsider, new-evidence availability and attempts to relitigate underlying EB-1A criteria.', 'caveats': 'Do not present as a fresh merits adjudication; use the underlying appeal for full original criterion findings.'}

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

Open the official USCIS decision PDF. Page-specific citations were not available in the normalized row.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Final Merits research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for JUL172012_05B2203