AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision JUL152021_02B2203: Judging the work of others

AAO EB-1A decision JUL152021_02B2203: Judging the work of others

EB-1A judging the work of others — AAO decision JUL152021_02B2203: dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.

Decision summary: AAO decision JUL152021_02B2203: dismissed. The Director’s findings on judging and leading/critical role were not disturbed. The AAO rejected the high-salary claim and the petitioner did not establish three criteria; final merits was therefore not reached.

Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.

Scope classification from review: Complete EB-1A AAO decision or related proceeding reviewed from assigned source PDF; no publication or CMS changes.. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

JUL152021_02B2203

Decision date as printed

2021-07-15

Classification / field stated in source

Nonprecedent AAO EB-1A appellate or related motion decision

Procedural posture

Appeal of Texas Service Center denial of EB-1A petition.

Operative disposition

dismissed

Final-merits status

Not reached; only two criteria were found established.

What the AAO decision addressed

The Director’s findings on judging and leading/critical role were not disturbed. The AAO rejected the high-salary claim and the petitioner did not establish three criteria; final merits was therefore not reached.

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

Not considered — source PDF

Membership

Not considered — source PDF

Published material about the person

Not considered — source PDF

Judging the work of others

met — p. 2

Original contributions of major significance

Not met — p. 2

Scholarly authorship

Not considered — source PDF

Artistic display or showcases

Not considered — source PDF

Leading or critical role

met — p. 2

High salary or remuneration

Not met — p. 3, p. 4, p. 5

Commercial success in the performing arts

Not considered — source PDF

Source-cited findings recorded in review

  • claim: The Director’s findings on judging and leading/critical role were not disturbed. The AAO rejected the high-salary claim and the petitioner did not establish three criteria; final merits was therefore not reached.; pages: 1; 2; 3; 4; 5; 6

  • claim: Decision date, petition classification and case field verified from the source caption/opening page.; pages: 1

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: caveats: The decision does not provide a separate analysis of all claims; findings are limited to the criteria identified and reviewed.; eligible_for_aggregation: True; eligible_for_individual_decision_page: True; reason: Narrow professional comparison on judging/leadership and the need to compare compensation against contemporaneous, occupation- and geography-specific data.; recommended_use: Source-cited case page or tightly scoped aggregation preserving date, field, procedural posture, criterion states and whether formal final merits was reached.

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Awards research

  • Membership research

  • Published material about the person research

  • Judging the work of others research

  • Original contributions of major significance research

  • Scholarly authorship research

  • Artistic display or showcases research

  • Leading or critical role research

  • High salary or remuneration research

  • Commercial success in the performing arts research

  • Medicine sector research

  • Final Merits research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for JUL152021_02B2203