AAO research
EB-1A judging the work of others — AAO decision JUL152013_03B2203: Appeal dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.
Decision summary: The AAO Appeal dismissed Judging and scholarly authorship criteria are met; original contributions and leading/critical role not met; remaining issues not established/claimed; threshold of three fails and no separate formal FMD.
Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.
Scope classification from review: Physical decision identifies an AAO appeal concerning an EB-1A extraordinary-ability Form I-140.. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | JUL152013_03B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | July 15, 2013 |
Classification / field stated in source | EB-1A extraordinary ability (Form I-140) |
Procedural posture | Nonprecedent AAO appeal from Texas Service Center denial of EB-1A; petitioner seeks extraordinary ability in sciences; appeal dismissed. |
Operative disposition | Appeal dismissed |
Final-merits status | The AAO expressly states that the required threshold of three evidentiary criteria was not established, so a separate formal final-merits determination was not reached. |
What the AAO decision addressed
Judging and scholarly authorship criteria are met; original contributions and leading/critical role not met; remaining issues not established/claimed; threshold of three fails and no separate formal FMD.
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | Not considered — source PDF |
Membership | Not considered — source PDF |
Published material about the person | Not considered — source PDF |
Judging the work of others | met — p. 4 |
Original contributions of major significance | |
Scholarly authorship | met — p. 9 |
Artistic display or showcases | Not considered — source PDF |
Leading or critical role | |
High salary or remuneration | Not considered — source PDF |
Commercial success in the performing arts | Not considered — source PDF |
Source-cited findings recorded in review
claim: The beneficiary is an agricultural data scientist with graduate training in agricultural meteorology/agronomy; employer plans to continue her work on crop-simulation platforms.; evidence_pages: 2
claim: AAO agrees judging and scholarly authorship are established, but finds the work’s improvements to existing models do not show contributions of major significance and rejects critical-role evidence.; evidence_pages: 3; 4; 5; 6; 7; 8; 9
claim: Only two criteria are established; the AAO dismisses the appeal without separate formal final merits.; evidence_pages: 9; 10
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: Eligible with caveats
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Awards research
Membership research
Published material about the person research
Judging the work of others research
Original contributions of major significance research
Scholarly authorship research
Artistic display or showcases research
Leading or critical role research
High salary or remuneration research
Commercial success in the performing arts research
Computing sector research
Threshold research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.