AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision JUL142006_01B2203: Artistic display or showcases

AAO EB-1A decision JUL142006_01B2203: Artistic display or showcases

EB-1A artistic display or showcases — AAO decision JUL142006_01B2203: Director decision withdrawn; petition remanded for further action. Review source…

Decision summary: The AAO director decision withdrawn; petition Remanded for further action. Artistic display: met (Director finding expressly described as correct by AAO, p. 3). Awards and published material about the beneficiary: not resolved; Remanded for proper evidence review (p. 3). Final merits/sustained acclaim not reached.

Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.

Scope classification from review: In scope; verified in source review. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

JUL142006_01B2203

Decision date as printed

July 14, 2006

Classification / field stated in source

EB-1A extraordinary ability in the arts; petitioner is an artist.

Procedural posture

On appeal from denial, AAO found that the Director’s discussion of awards and published materials relied on evidence unrelated to the petitioner, preventing a meaningful appeal. AAO stated the Director correctly found the artistic-display criterion met, withdrew the decision, and Remanded for reconsideration of the relevant evidence under the awards and published-material criteria. The remand also calls for consideration of whether acclaim was sustained as of filing.

Operative disposition

Director decision withdrawn; petition Remanded for further action.

Final-merits status

not reached

What the AAO decision addressed

Artistic display: met (Director finding expressly described as correct by AAO, p. 3). Awards and published material about the beneficiary: not resolved; Remanded for proper evidence review (p. 3). Final merits/sustained acclaim not reached.

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

not reached

Membership

not considered

Published material about the person

not reached

Judging the work of others

not considered

Original contributions of major significance

not considered

Scholarly authorship

not considered

Artistic display or showcases

met — source PDF

Leading or critical role

not considered

High salary or remuneration

not considered

Commercial success in the performing arts

not considered

Source-cited findings recorded in review

  • Artistic display: met (Director finding expressly described as correct by AAO, p. 3). Awards and published material about the beneficiary: not resolved; Remanded for proper evidence review (p. 3). Final merits/sustained acclaim not reached.

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: Do not treat the remand as an award or published-material finding or as an approval; sustained acclaim remains for further consideration.

Editorial use note: Eligible for carefully scoped, citation-rich content; identify nonprecedent status and exact procedural posture.

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Awards research

  • Membership research

  • Published material about the person research

  • Judging the work of others research

  • Original contributions of major significance research

  • Scholarly authorship research

  • Artistic display or showcases research

  • Leading or critical role research

  • High salary or remuneration research

  • Commercial success in the performing arts research

  • Performance sector research

  • Final Merits research

  • Remand research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for JUL142006_01B2203