AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision JUL122005_02B2203: Awards

AAO EB-1A decision JUL122005_02B2203: Awards

EB-1A awards — AAO decision JUL122005_02B2203: Appeal dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.

Decision summary: AAO decision JUL122005_02B2203: Appeal dismissed. The petitioner’s competition placements are local/regional or after filing; membership and publicity fail regulatory standards. The record does not establish national/international acclaim or a qualifying future-work plan.

Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.

Scope classification from review: In scope; verified in source review. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

JUL122005_02B2203

Decision date as printed

July 12, 2005

Classification / field stated in source

EB-1A extraordinary ability; arm-wrestling athlete

Procedural posture

Appeal from denial.

Operative disposition

Appeal dismissed.

Final-merits status

"not met"

What the AAO decision addressed

The petitioner’s competition placements are local/regional or after filing; membership and publicity fail regulatory standards. The record does not establish national/international acclaim or a qualifying future-work plan.

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

not met
New York/state or regional competition results are not shown to be nationally or internationally recognized prizes; later award evidence postdates filing (pp. 2–3). — source PDF

Membership

not met
Association membership evidence does not show outstanding achievements judged by recognized experts (p. 3). — source PDF

Published material about the person

not met
Submitted publicity does not constitute qualifying coverage about petitioner in professional/major trade publications or major media (pp. 3–4). — source PDF

Judging the work of others

Not coded — source PDF

Original contributions of major significance

Not coded — source PDF

Scholarly authorship

Not coded — source PDF

Artistic display or showcases

Not coded — source PDF

Leading or critical role

Not coded — source PDF

High salary or remuneration

Not coded — source PDF

Commercial success in the performing arts

Not coded — source PDF

Source-cited findings recorded in review

  • pp. 1–5; page-by-page notes below.

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: Historical athletics example for the distinction between local competition placement and nationally/internationally recognized awards; verify current regulatory context before editorial use. eligible_for_editorial_review_with_citations

Editorial use note: eligible_for_editorial_review_with_citations

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Awards research

  • Membership research

  • Published material about the person research

  • Athletics sector research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for JUL122005_02B2203