AAO research
EB-1A motion disposition — AAO decision JUL112012_03B2203: Motions dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.
Decision summary: AAO decision JUL112012_03B2203: Motions dismissed. AAO found submitted evidence was not new or material to the prior proceeding and the motion did not establish error; prior denial affirmed.
Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.
Scope classification from review: in_scope_EB1A_AAO_decision. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | JUL112012_03B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | July 11, 2012 |
Classification / field stated in source | Motion to reopen and reconsider dismissed |
Procedural posture | Combined motions following prior AAO denial; petitioner submitted new evidence and argued prior factual/legal error. |
Operative disposition | Motions dismissed |
Final-merits status | Prior denial affirmed; no fresh final-merits determination in the motion decision. |
What the AAO decision addressed
AAO found submitted evidence was not new or material to the prior proceeding and the motion did not establish error; prior denial affirmed.
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | Not reached — source PDF |
Membership | Not reached — source PDF |
Published material about the person | Not reached |
Judging the work of others | Not reached — source PDF |
Original contributions of major significance | Not reached — source PDF |
Scholarly authorship | Not reached — source PDF |
Artistic display or showcases | Not coded — source PDF |
Leading or critical role | Not reached |
High salary or remuneration | Not reached — source PDF |
Commercial success in the performing arts | Not reached — source PDF |
Source-cited findings recorded in review
claim: Cover identifies motions and date July 11, 2012; identity is redacted.; pages: 1
claim: AAO summarizes the prior appeal and explains reopening/reconsideration standards.; pages: 2
claim: AAO concludes evidence and arguments do not establish a basis to reopen or reconsider.; pages: 3
claim: AAO dismisses both motions and affirms the prior denial.; pages: 4
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: eligible_for_narrow_fact_grounded_content: True; must_preserve_procedural_posture: True; recommended_use: Procedural motion example only: distinguish new evidence from evidence available during the original proceeding and preserve the prior denial posture.
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Published material about the person research
Leading or critical role research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.