AAO research
EB-1A awards — AAO decision JUL082009_01B2203: Appeal dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.
Decision summary: The AAO Appeal dismissed The AAO finds the submitted awards, membership, published material, judging, original contributions, display, and leading/critical-role evidence insufficient. The final-merits discussion also finds sustained acclaim/top-of-field standing unestablished.
Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.
Scope classification from review: Physical source is an AAO decision on an EB-1A extraordinary-ability Form I-140 appeal.. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | JUL082009_01B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | July 8, 2009 |
Classification / field stated in source | EB-1A extraordinary ability (Form I-140) |
Procedural posture | Nonprecedent AAO appeal from a service-center denial; appeal dismissed after final-merits discussion. |
Operative disposition | Appeal dismissed |
Final-merits status | The AAO reviews the totality of evidence and finds that it does not establish sustained national or international acclaim or top-of-field standing. |
What the AAO decision addressed
The AAO finds the submitted awards, membership, published material, judging, original contributions, display, and leading/critical-role evidence insufficient. The final-merits discussion also finds sustained acclaim/top-of-field standing unestablished.
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | |
Membership | |
Published material about the person | |
Judging the work of others | Not met — p. 8 |
Original contributions of major significance | |
Scholarly authorship | Not considered — source PDF |
Artistic display or showcases | Not met — p. 10 |
Leading or critical role | |
High salary or remuneration | Not considered — source PDF |
Commercial success in the performing arts | Not considered — source PDF |
Source-cited findings recorded in review
claim: Petitioner seeks classification in the arts as a musician/performer, relying on Nepalese music and performance evidence.; evidence_pages: 2; 3; 4
claim: AAO rejects claimed awards, membership, media coverage, judging, contributions, display, and role evidence.; evidence_pages: 4; 5; 6; 7; 8; 9; 10; 11
claim: The final-merits discussion finds sustained acclaim and top-of-field recognition unestablished; appeal dismissed.; evidence_pages: 11; 12
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: Eligible with caveats
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Awards research
Membership research
Published material about the person research
Judging the work of others research
Original contributions of major significance research
Scholarly authorship research
Artistic display or showcases research
Leading or critical role research
High salary or remuneration research
Commercial success in the performing arts research
Performance sector research
Final Merits research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.