AAO research
EB-1A original contributions of major significance — AAO decision JUL052005_02B2203: Appeal dismissed (p. 7). Review source status, procedural posture and…
Decision summary: AAO decision JUL052005_02B2203: Appeal dismissed (p. 7). AAO found the record established influence on Australian television under original contributions, and discussed leadership/critical-role and commercial-success claims. The evidence did not establish the threshold and sustained acclaim; older decision applies an aggregate assessment (pp. 3–7).
Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.
Scope classification from review: in_scope_EB1A_source_reviewed. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | JUL052005_02B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | July 5, 2005 |
Classification / field stated in source | EB-1A business/arts-related appeal; petitioner described as an Australian television development and publicity consultant. |
Procedural posture | Appeal of California Service Center denial; AAO dismissed (pp. 2, 7). |
Operative disposition | Appeal dismissed (p. 7). |
Final-merits status | Older decision expressly assesses sustained acclaim in the aggregate after criteria review; AAO found the petitioner was not shown to be at the very top of the field (p. 6). |
What the AAO decision addressed
AAO found the record established influence on Australian television under original contributions, and discussed leadership/critical-role and commercial-success claims. The evidence did not establish the threshold and sustained acclaim; older decision applies an aggregate assessment (pp. 3–7).
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | Not coded — source PDF |
Membership | Not coded — source PDF |
Published material about the person | Not coded — source PDF |
Judging the work of others | Not coded — source PDF |
Original contributions of major significance | met |
Scholarly authorship | Not coded — source PDF |
Artistic display or showcases | Not coded — source PDF |
Leading or critical role | not met |
High salary or remuneration | not met |
Commercial success in the performing arts | not met |
Source-cited findings recorded in review
Citations refer to physical PDF page numbers. Every physical page was visually inspected in order.
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: Narrow case page on proving individual contribution to successful television productions; avoid implying all claims failed because AAO expressly credited influence on Australian television. Eligible for editorial consideration after legal/editorial source citation and nonprecedent labeling review; no CMS action taken.
Editorial use note: Eligible for editorial consideration after legal/editorial source citation and nonprecedent labeling review; no CMS action taken.
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Original contributions of major significance research
Leading or critical role research
High salary or remuneration research
Commercial success in the performing arts research
Entrepreneurship sector research
Performance sector research
Threshold research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.