AAO research
EB-1A published material about the person — AAO decision JUL022019_03B2203: Motion to reconsider denied; motion to reopen denied. Review source status…
Decision summary: AAO decision JUL022019_03B2203: Motion to reconsider denied; motion to reopen denied. The latest AAO decision had addressed the three identified criteria; the motion showed no legal or factual error and supplied no new evidence, instead resubmitting evidence already considered.
Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.
Scope classification from review: EB-1A procedural motion with limited discussion of three previously adjudicated criteria.. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | JUL022019_03B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | July 2, 2019 |
Classification / field stated in source | Combined motion to reopen and motion to reconsider; both denied |
Procedural posture | Petitioner had earlier appealed an EB-1A denial; AAO dismissed that appeal after finding he had not met any initial criterion. Current motions repeat three criterion claims concerning published material, judging, and scholarly authorship. |
Operative disposition | Motion to reconsider denied; motion to reopen denied. |
Final-merits status | No new final-merits review; the prior appeal had found the initial threshold unmet. |
What the AAO decision addressed
The latest AAO decision had addressed the three identified criteria; the motion showed no legal or factual error and supplied no new evidence, instead resubmitting evidence already considered.
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | Not reached — source PDF |
Membership | Not reached — source PDF |
Published material about the person | Not met |
Judging the work of others | Not met — source PDF |
Original contributions of major significance | Not reached — source PDF |
Scholarly authorship | Not met — source PDF |
Artistic display or showcases | Not coded — source PDF |
Leading or critical role | Not reached — source PDF |
High salary or remuneration | Not reached — source PDF |
Commercial success in the performing arts | Not reached — source PDF |
Source-cited findings recorded in review
claim: Decision dated July 2, 2019 identifies petitioner as an accountant and denies combined motions to reopen and reconsider.; pages: 1
claim: Prior June 15, 2018 AAO decision dismissed the appeal after finding no initial criteria met; petitioner again raised published material, judging, and scholarly authorship.; pages: 1; 2
claim: AAO states it had already found no qualifying published material, that petitioner’s work as auditor/accountant did not satisfy judging, and that translations/publication evidence did not establish scholarly authorship.; pages: 2; 3
claim: The motion to reopen resubmitted previously provided evidence and established no new facts; both motions denied.; pages: 3
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: Criterion-specific secondary discussion; do not count as a new merits outcome.
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Published material about the person research
Leading or critical role research
Entrepreneurship sector research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.