AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision JAN312005_02B2203: Withdrawal and mootness

AAO EB-1A decision JAN312005_02B2203: Withdrawal and mootness

EB-1A withdrawal and mootness — AAO decision JAN312005_02B2203: Appeal dismissed as moot after adjustment to lawful permanent resident status. Review…

Decision summary: AAO decision JAN312005_02B2203: Appeal dismissed as moot after adjustment to lawful permanent resident status. AAO emphasizes the notice is not an acknowledgement of withdrawal; appeal was dismissed because petitioner had adjusted to LPR status.

Source limitation: The review record contains a source hold or limitation. Read the limitation below before relying on any case detail; unresolved facts are not treated as findings.

Scope classification from review: in_scope_EB1A_AAO_decision_no_precedent_status_asserted. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

JAN312005_02B2203

Decision date as printed

January 31, 2005

Classification / field stated in source

EB-1A Form I-140; field not specified in the AAO discussion

Procedural posture

California Service Center denial appealed. CIS records showed a later I-140 under a lesser classification was approved February 26, 2003, followed by an I-485 adjustment approval July 28, 2004. Petitioner declined to withdraw when queried.

Operative disposition

Appeal dismissed as moot after adjustment to lawful permanent resident status.

Final-merits status

Not reached

What the AAO decision addressed

AAO emphasizes the notice is not an acknowledgement of withdrawal; appeal was dismissed because petitioner had adjusted to LPR status.

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

Not reached — source PDF

Membership

Not reached
The AAO resolved the matter on a procedural ground or mootness and did not adjudicate this criterion. — source PDF

Published material about the person

Not reached — source PDF

Judging the work of others

Not reached
The AAO resolved the matter on a procedural ground or mootness and did not adjudicate this criterion. — source PDF

Original contributions of major significance

Not reached
The AAO resolved the matter on a procedural ground or mootness and did not adjudicate this criterion. — source PDF

Scholarly authorship

Not reached
The AAO resolved the matter on a procedural ground or mootness and did not adjudicate this criterion. — source PDF

Artistic display or showcases

Not reached
The AAO resolved the matter on a procedural ground or mootness and did not adjudicate this criterion. — source PDF

Leading or critical role

Not reached
The AAO resolved the matter on a procedural ground or mootness and did not adjudicate this criterion. — source PDF

High salary or remuneration

Not reached
The AAO resolved the matter on a procedural ground or mootness and did not adjudicate this criterion. — source PDF

Commercial success in the performing arts

Not reached
The AAO resolved the matter on a procedural ground or mootness and did not adjudicate this criterion. — source PDF

Source holds and limits

status:

Specific caveats recorded by the reviewer

  • No EB-1A criterion or final-merits question reached.

  • Underlying adjustment and other petition details are reported only as AAO recites CIS records.

Source-cited findings recorded in review

  • claim: The source cover identifies an AAO decision dated January 31, 2005.; pages: 1

  • claim: Classification/field as described in the source: EB-1A Form I-140; field not specified in the AAO discussion.; pages: 2

  • claim: California Service Center denial appealed. CIS records showed a later I-140 under a lesser classification was approved February 26, 2003, followed by an I-485 adjustment approval July 28, 2004. Petitioner declined to withdraw when queried.; pages: 2

  • claim: AAO emphasizes the notice is not an acknowledgement of withdrawal; appeal was dismissed because petitioner had adjusted to LPR status.; pages: 2

  • claim: Operative order: Appeal dismissed as moot after adjustment to lawful permanent resident status.; pages: 2

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: narrow_procedural_explainer_only

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Membership research

  • Judging the work of others research

  • Original contributions of major significance research

  • Scholarly authorship research

  • Artistic display or showcases research

  • Leading or critical role research

  • High salary or remuneration research

  • Commercial success in the performing arts research

  • Withdrawal research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for JAN312005_02B2203