AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision JAN302019_02B2203: Published material about the person

AAO EB-1A decision JAN302019_02B2203: Published material about the person

EB-1A published material about the person — AAO decision JAN302019_02B2203: Appeal dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official…

Decision summary: AAO decision JAN302019_02B2203: Appeal dismissed. Artistic display at dance shows and exhibitions was accepted. Published articles and listings did not establish qualifying published material about petitioner relating to her work in professional/major media. Judging claim was not asserted on appeal and, even if met, would not reach three criteria. AAO concluded the record did not show acclaim/top-of-field standing.

Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.

Scope classification from review: EB-1A source; in-scope as substantive decision. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

JAN302019_02B2203

Decision date as printed

January 30, 2019

Classification / field stated in source

EB-1A appeal dismissed

Procedural posture

Director found artistic-display criterion met, but petitioner had not asserted or established two more criteria. AAO rejected published-material claims and did not reach judging claim because threshold remained unmet.

Operative disposition

Appeal dismissed.

Final-merits status

not reached as a formal final-merits determination; AAO separately found the record did not demonstrate sustained acclaim/top-of-field standing.

What the AAO decision addressed

Artistic display at dance shows and exhibitions was accepted. Published articles and listings did not establish qualifying published material about petitioner relating to her work in professional/major media. Judging claim was not asserted on appeal and, even if met, would not reach three criteria. AAO concluded the record did not show acclaim/top-of-field standing.

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

Not reached — source PDF

Membership

Not reached — source PDF

Published material about the person

Not met
Published materials/listings did not meet the criterion’s subject, relation-to-work, and qualifying-media requirements. — p. 2, p. 3

Judging the work of others

Not reached — source PDF

Original contributions of major significance

Not reached — source PDF

Scholarly authorship

Not reached — source PDF

Artistic display or showcases

Not coded — source PDF

Leading or critical role

Not reached
This decision did not decide this criterion. — source PDF

High salary or remuneration

Not reached — source PDF

Commercial success in the performing arts

Not reached — source PDF

Source-cited findings recorded in review

  • claim: Cover dates Matter of E-M-P- January 30, 2019; petitioner is an avant-garde dance artist.; pages: 1

  • claim: Director found artistic-display criterion met; AAO states petitioner had not asserted or established two additional criteria.; pages: 2

  • claim: AAO found submitted published materials did not establish articles about petitioner relating to her work in qualifying professional/major media.; pages: 2; 3

  • claim: The record showed judging dance performances, but petitioner did not claim this criterion on appeal; AAO said even assuming it were met, the initial threshold still would not be reached.; pages: 3

  • claim: AAO dismissed the appeal and stated no formal final-merits determination was needed because initial evidence was insufficient, while separately noting the record did not show sustained acclaim/top-of-field standing.; pages: 3; 4

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: Eligible for a cited explainer on published-material requirements for performing artists; avoid treating program/event listings as categorically inadequate.

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Published material about the person research

  • Leading or critical role research

  • Performance sector research

  • Threshold research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for JAN302019_02B2203