AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision JAN272017_01B2203: Published material about the person

AAO EB-1A decision JAN272017_01B2203: Published material about the person

EB-1A published material about the person — AAO decision JAN272017_01B2203: Director decision withdrawn; appeal sustained; petition approved. Review…

Decision summary: AAO decision JAN272017_01B2203: Director decision withdrawn; appeal sustained; petition approved. AAO found newspaper articles about petitioner, exhibition of architectural work, leadership of projects for a distinguished organization, and compensation of $250,000 relative to occupational data. It found more than 25 years’ experience and extensive coverage supported sustained acclaim/top-of-field standing and approved.

Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.

Scope classification from review: EB-1A merits appeal and approval, including final-merits determination.. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

JAN272017_01B2203

Decision date as printed

January 27, 2017

Classification / field stated in source

EB-1A appeal sustained; petition approved

Procedural posture

Director found published-material criterion met but denied for failure to establish three criteria. AAO found display, leading/critical role, and high salary criteria met in addition to published material, then conducted final merits.

Operative disposition

Director decision withdrawn; appeal sustained; petition approved.

Final-merits status

Reached; AAO found sustained acclaim/top-of-field standing and approved.

What the AAO decision addressed

AAO found newspaper articles about petitioner, exhibition of architectural work, leadership of projects for a distinguished organization, and compensation of $250,000 relative to occupational data. It found more than 25 years’ experience and extensive coverage supported sustained acclaim/top-of-field standing and approved.

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

Not reached — source PDF

Membership

Not reached — source PDF

Published material about the person

met
AAO affirmed major-newspaper articles about petitioner. — p. 2, p. 3

Judging the work of others

Not reached — source PDF

Original contributions of major significance

Not reached — source PDF

Scholarly authorship

Not reached — source PDF

Artistic display or showcases

Not coded — source PDF

Leading or critical role

met
AAO found project leadership for distinguished organization. — p. 3, p. 4

High salary or remuneration

met — source PDF

Commercial success in the performing arts

Not reached — source PDF

Source-cited findings recorded in review

  • claim: Cover dates January 27, 2017 and identifies petitioner as architect in the arts.; pages: 1

  • claim: AAO found published-material criterion met based on articles about petitioner in a major Venezuelan newspaper.; pages: 2

  • claim: AAO found display and leading/critical role criteria met based on architectural exhibitions, project leadership, and distinguished organization; high salary met based on $250,000 compensation compared with occupational data.; pages: 3

  • claim: AAO found sustained acclaim/top-of-field standing, continued work, and prospective U.S. benefit; appeal sustained.; pages: 3; 4

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: Eligible as approval example with criterion and final-merits distinctions.

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Published material about the person research

  • Leading or critical role research

  • Performance sector research

  • Other Named Professions sector research

  • Final Merits research

  • Coverage research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for JAN272017_01B2203