AAO research
EB-1A awards — AAO decision JAN262015_02B2203: Appeal dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.
Decision summary: AAO decision JAN262015_02B2203: Appeal dismissed. New manuscripts/publications postdated the petition filing and cannot establish eligibility at filing. Petitioner did not contest awards, membership, or judging findings and abandoned those claims. Appeal arguments on original contributions and leading/critical role did not identify specific error or explain how evidence met criteria. AAO’s de novo review counted only judging and scholarly articles, withdrew Director’s findings on contributions and role, and found fewer than three criteria.
Source limitation: The review record contains a source hold or limitation. Read the limitation below before relying on any case detail; unresolved facts are not treated as findings.
Scope classification from review: In scope; verified in source review. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | JAN262015_02B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | January 26, 2015 |
Classification / field stated in source | EB-1A extraordinary ability; field: physician/neonatologist. |
Procedural posture | Appeal after denial and motion dismissal; AAO summarily dismisses for failure to identify error in Director’s decision. |
Operative disposition | Appeal dismissed. |
Final-merits status | Not reached by AAO; the Director had made an adverse final-merits finding, but AAO does not affirm it after finding the threshold unmet. |
What the AAO decision addressed
New manuscripts/publications postdated the petition filing and cannot establish eligibility at filing. Petitioner did not contest awards, membership, or judging findings and abandoned those claims. Appeal arguments on original contributions and leading/critical role did not identify specific error or explain how evidence met criteria. AAO’s de novo review counted only judging and scholarly articles, withdrew Director’s findings on contributions and role, and found fewer than three criteria.
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | abandoned — source PDF |
Membership | abandoned — source PDF |
Published material about the person | Not coded — source PDF |
Judging the work of others | met — source PDF |
Original contributions of major significance | not met — source PDF |
Scholarly authorship | met — source PDF |
Artistic display or showcases | Not coded — source PDF |
Leading or critical role | not met — source PDF |
High salary or remuneration | Not coded — source PDF |
Commercial success in the performing arts | Not coded — source PDF |
Source holds and limits
"Some claimed appeal evidence is not considered because it postdates filing or is abandoned; Director’s prior adverse final-merits finding is not independently re-adjudicated by AAO here."
Source-cited findings recorded in review
PDF p. 1: Cover identifies Jan. 26, 2015, Texas Service Center, EB-1A appeal; petitioner redacted.
PDF p. 2: AAO recounts claims: manuscript dates postdate filing; petitioner does not challenge awards, membership, or judging findings, abandoning those issues; only judging and scholarly articles remain as AAO-accepted criteria.
PDF p. 3: AAO withdraws Director findings on contributions and leading/critical role; generalized appeal arguments do not show error or criterion eligibility.
PDF p. 4: Failure to identify specific error mandates summary dismissal; AAO does not reach final merits in this appeal.
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: Narrow comparison for filing-date rule, preservation of claims on appeal, and specificity needed to establish original contributions/leading role.
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Awards research
Membership research
Judging the work of others research
Original contributions of major significance research
Scholarly authorship research
Leading or critical role research
Medicine sector research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.