AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision JAN252013_04B2203: Awards

AAO EB-1A decision JAN252013_04B2203: Awards

EB-1A awards — AAO decision JAN252013_04B2203: Appeal dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.

Decision summary: The AAO Appeal dismissed The AAO accepted published material, treated membership and judging as abandoned, withdrew the Director’s artistic-display finding, and rejected awards and leading/critical role; the initial three-criterion requirement was not met.

Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.

Scope classification from review: The source is a Form I-140 EB-1A extraordinary-ability decision.. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

JAN252013_04B2203

Decision date as printed

January 25, 2013

Classification / field stated in source

Form I-140 EB-1A extraordinary-ability decision under INA §203(b)(1)(A).

Procedural posture

Appeal from the Director’s decision on a motion to reopen/reconsider a prior denial; appeal dismissed.

Operative disposition

Appeal dismissed

Final-merits status

The initial three-criterion requirement was not met; the AAO states that a separate final-merits determination was unnecessary.

What the AAO decision addressed

The AAO accepted published material, treated membership and judging as abandoned, withdrew the Director’s artistic-display finding, and rejected awards and leading/critical role; the initial three-criterion requirement was not met.

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

Not met — p. 4, p. 5

Membership

abandoned — p. 6

Published material about the person

met — p. 6

Judging the work of others

abandoned — p. 6

Original contributions of major significance

Not coded — source PDF

Scholarly authorship

Not coded — source PDF

Artistic display or showcases

Not met — p. 6, p. 7

Leading or critical role

Not met — p. 7, p. 8

High salary or remuneration

Not coded — source PDF

Commercial success in the performing arts

Not coded — source PDF

Source-cited findings recorded in review

  • claim: The petitioner sought classification as a DanceSport dancer; the appeal followed a motion to reopen/reconsider a July 2012 denial, which the Director accepted but denied on the merits in September 2012.; pages: 2

  • claim: The AAO found award evidence was local/regional, post-filing, finalist rather than winner, or unsupported as nationally/internationally recognized; it did not meet the awards criterion.; pages: 4; 5

  • claim: Membership and judging denials were not challenged on appeal and were treated as abandoned.; pages: 6

  • claim: The AAO affirmed the Director’s published-material finding, but withdrew the artistic-display finding because the petitioner was an athlete and had not shown visual-art work displayed at qualifying exhibitions/showcases.; pages: 6; 7

  • claim: The claimed leading/critical roles failed because the record did not establish distinguished reputations or sufficiently detailed impact on the organizations as a whole.; pages: 7; 8

  • claim: The petitioner did not meet the required three criteria; the AAO dismissed the appeal without a formal final-merits determination.; pages: 8; 9

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: Eligible for individual case discussion

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Awards research

  • Membership research

  • Published material about the person research

  • Judging the work of others research

  • Artistic display or showcases research

  • Leading or critical role research

  • Athletics sector research

  • Performance sector research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for JAN252013_04B2203