AAO research
EB-1A awards — AAO decision JAN182008_02B2203: Appeal dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.
Decision summary: The AAO Appeal dismissed The AAO found fewer than three criteria established and concluded the total record did not show extraordinary ability; appeal dismissed.
Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.
Scope classification from review: Source is an AAO decision involving an EB-1A extraordinary-ability petition.. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | JAN182008_02B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | January 18, 2008 |
Classification / field stated in source | EB-1A extraordinary ability (Form I-140) |
Procedural posture | AAO appeal from Nebraska Service Center denial of an EB-1A Form I-140; petitioner sought classification as an acting instructor, with record also describing scientific research. |
Operative disposition | Appeal dismissed |
Final-merits status | The petitioner did not establish three criteria; AAO gives an aggregate negative acclaim assessment but no separate formal final-merits section. |
What the AAO decision addressed
The AAO found fewer than three criteria established and concluded the total record did not show extraordinary ability; appeal dismissed.
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | |
Membership | Not met — p. 5 |
Published material about the person | Not considered — source PDF |
Judging the work of others | Not met — p. 6 |
Original contributions of major significance | |
Scholarly authorship | |
Artistic display or showcases | Not considered — source PDF |
Leading or critical role | abandoned — p. 10 |
High salary or remuneration | Not considered — source PDF |
Commercial success in the performing arts | Not considered — source PDF |
Source-cited findings recorded in review
claim: The petitioner sought classification as an acting instructor; the decision also describes postdoctoral research and polymer science publications.; evidence_pages: 2; 3; 4; 7
claim: The AAO rejected awards, membership, judging, and original contributions; accepted scholarly authorship; leading-role claim was no longer pursued on appeal.; evidence_pages: 3; 4; 5; 6; 7; 8; 9; 10
claim: The AAO found no sustained acclaim or top-of-field standing and dismissed the appeal.; evidence_pages: 10
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: Eligible with caveats
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Awards research
Membership research
Published material about the person research
Judging the work of others research
Original contributions of major significance research
Scholarly authorship research
Artistic display or showcases research
Leading or critical role research
High salary or remuneration research
Commercial success in the performing arts research
Medicine sector research
Threshold research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.