AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision JAN152025_01B2203: High salary or remuneration

AAO EB-1A decision JAN152025_01B2203: High salary or remuneration

EB-1A high salary or remuneration — AAO decision JAN152025_01B2203: Appeal dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.

Decision summary: AAO decision JAN152025_01B2203: Appeal dismissed. AAO finds the high-salary criterion not met because statistics compare the petitioner’s compensation to accountants, while her actual regional accounting-manager job also involved managing six offices/personnel and the comparison did not fit that role. Membership and leading/critical role claims are expressly reserved because they are unnecessary once the salary criterion fails; fewer than three claimed criteria.

Source limitation: The review record contains a source hold or limitation. Read the limitation below before relying on any case detail; unresolved facts are not treated as findings.

Scope classification from review: In scope; verified in source review. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

JAN152025_01B2203

Decision date as printed

January 15, 2025

Classification / field stated in source

EB-1A extraordinary ability; field: accountant and business operations manager / regional accounting manager.

Procedural posture

Appeal from Nebraska Service Center denial.

Operative disposition

Appeal dismissed.

Final-merits status

Not reached; expressly unnecessary because initial threshold not met.

What the AAO decision addressed

AAO finds the high-salary criterion not met because statistics compare the petitioner’s compensation to accountants, while her actual regional accounting-manager job also involved managing six offices/personnel and the comparison did not fit that role. Membership and leading/critical role claims are expressly reserved because they are unnecessary once the salary criterion fails; fewer than three claimed criteria.

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

Not coded — source PDF

Membership

not considered

Published material about the person

Not coded — source PDF

Judging the work of others

Not coded — source PDF

Original contributions of major significance

Not coded — source PDF

Scholarly authorship

Not coded — source PDF

Artistic display or showcases

Not coded — source PDF

Leading or critical role

not considered

High salary or remuneration

not met — source PDF

Commercial success in the performing arts

Not coded — source PDF

Source holds and limits

"Complete; no source hold. Membership/role are reserved, not adjudicated adversely."

Source-cited findings recorded in review

  • PDF p. 1: Cover identifies accountant/business operations manager, appeal, date, and denial. AAO explains it dismisses because salary criterion is not met; membership and role reserved.

  • PDF p. 2: Law and analysis; duties include accounting and personnel management/oversight across company locations; three claimed criteria identified.

  • PDF p. 3: Salary evidence and comparator mismatch analyzed; actual role is managerial and regional, not solely accountant; salary criterion fails; appeal dismissed.

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: Narrow comparison for matching salary benchmarks to actual role and duties; useful to avoid occupational-comparator mismatch.

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Membership research

  • Leading or critical role research

  • High salary or remuneration research

  • Entrepreneurship sector research

  • Performance sector research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for JAN152025_01B2203