AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision JAN132010_01B2203: Membership

AAO EB-1A decision JAN132010_01B2203: Membership

EB-1A membership — AAO decision JAN132010_01B2203: Appeal dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.

Decision summary: AAO decision JAN132010_01B2203: Appeal dismissed. The AAO found high salary met but membership, original contributions, and leading/critical role not met; only one of the three criteria was established, so the appeal was dismissed.

Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.

Scope classification from review: The source is an AAO EB-1A petition appeal and contains decision-specific procedural/evidentiary analysis.. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

JAN132010_01B2203

Decision date as printed

January 13, 2010

Classification / field stated in source

EB-1A extraordinary-ability petition appeal

Procedural posture

EB-1A appeal; appeal dismissed; one salary criterion met, fewer than three criteria established.

Operative disposition

Appeal dismissed

Final-merits status

Legacy decision; AAO made an aggregate sustained-acclaim/top-of-field finding rather than a separate modern final-merits determination.

What the AAO decision addressed

The AAO found high salary met but membership, original contributions, and leading/critical role not met; only one of the three criteria was established, so the appeal was dismissed.

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

Not coded — source PDF

Membership

Not met — p. 3, p. 4, p. 5

Published material about the person

Not coded — source PDF

Judging the work of others

Not coded — source PDF

Original contributions of major significance

Not met — p. 5, p. 6

Scholarly authorship

Not coded — source PDF

Artistic display or showcases

Not coded — source PDF

Leading or critical role

Not met — p. 6, p. 7

High salary or remuneration

met — p. 7, p. 8

Commercial success in the performing arts

Not coded — source PDF

Source-cited findings recorded in review

  • claim: The petition was filed November 24, 2008; the petitioner claimed extraordinary ability as a computer systems analyst.; pages: 2; 3

  • claim: Associate membership in IEEE did not require outstanding achievement judged by recognized experts; the record did not show that the petitioner held Senior Member grade.; pages: 3; 4; 5

  • claim: Work on a Coca-Cola EDI/GXS AI project may have been original, but evidence showed no influence beyond Coca-Cola or major significance to the field.; pages: 5; 6

  • claim: Letters from colleagues did not establish that the petitioner’s role was leading/critical to companies overall; there was no organizational chart or corroboration distinguishing his role from other analysts.; pages: 6; 7

  • claim: Documented salary of about $112,000 in 2007–08 exceeded the cited 2006 median and top-decile threshold for computer systems analysts; AAO withdrew the Director’s adverse finding and accepted high salary.; pages: 7; 8

  • claim: The AAO concluded the petitioner did not meet three criteria or establish sustained acclaim/top-of-field standing and dismissed.; pages: 8

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: Eligible for individual case discussion

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Membership research

  • Original contributions of major significance research

  • Leading or critical role research

  • High salary or remuneration research

  • Computing sector research

  • Threshold research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for JAN132010_01B2203