AAO research
EB-1A motions to reopen — AAO decision JAN112023_02B2203: Motion to reopen and motion to reconsider dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture…
Decision summary: AAO decision JAN112023_02B2203: Motion to reopen and motion to reconsider dismissed. Motion to reopen did not present new evidence; reconsideration repeated arguments from prior brief without showing error of law or policy in the immediately preceding decision.
Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.
Scope classification from review: EB-1A in-scope; current decision is procedural or remand-stage as stated above.. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | JAN112023_02B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | January 11, 2023 |
Classification / field stated in source | EB-1A I-140; fourth combined motion to reopen and reconsider. |
Procedural posture | After denial and dismissal of appeal and three prior combined motions, petitioner filed a fourth combined motion. |
Operative disposition | Motion to reopen and motion to reconsider dismissed. |
Final-merits status | The decision states that the current motion is limited to the dismissal of the prior motion; no underlying eligibility criteria are decided anew. |
What the AAO decision addressed
Motion to reopen did not present new evidence; reconsideration repeated arguments from prior brief without showing error of law or policy in the immediately preceding decision.
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | Not reached — source PDF |
Membership | Not reached — source PDF |
Published material about the person | Not reached — source PDF |
Judging the work of others | Not reached — source PDF |
Original contributions of major significance | Not reached — source PDF |
Scholarly authorship | Not reached — source PDF |
Artistic display or showcases | Not coded — source PDF |
Leading or critical role | Not reached — source PDF |
High salary or remuneration | Not reached — source PDF |
Commercial success in the performing arts | Not reached — source PDF |
Source-cited findings recorded in review
claim: Cover identifies EB-1A petition, administrative services manager, and January 11, 2023 date.; pages: 1
claim: AAO recounts denial and dismissal of appeal and three prior combined motions; current filing is fourth combined motion.; pages: 1
claim: Submitted brief repeated experience and achievements already in record and did not identify legal error; both motions dismissed.; pages: 2
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: Procedural-only; do not aggregate as criterion outcomes.
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Published material about the person research
Leading or critical role research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.