AAO research
EB-1A awards — AAO decision JAN112012_02B2203: Appeal dismissed; petition denied. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.
Decision summary: The AAO Appeal dismissed; petition denied The operative order and the AAO’s stated eligibility analysis; see the cited final pages.
Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.
Scope classification from review: AAO decision on an EB-1A Form I-140 petition.. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | JAN112012_02B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | January 11, 2012 |
Classification / field stated in source | AAO decision concerning a Form I-140 petition for EB-1A classification under INA § 203(b)(1)(A). |
Procedural posture | AAO appeal from denial of an EB-1A petition for an educator and activist; appeal dismissed. |
Operative disposition | Appeal dismissed; petition denied |
Final-merits status | The AAO reaches final merits after finding one criterion met, but concludes the record does not show sustained acclaim or top-of-field standing. |
What the AAO decision addressed
The operative order and the AAO’s stated eligibility analysis; see the cited final pages.
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | |
Membership | Not considered — source PDF |
Published material about the person | met — p. 7 |
Judging the work of others | Not considered — source PDF |
Original contributions of major significance | |
Scholarly authorship | Not met — p. 13 |
Artistic display or showcases | Not met — p. 13 |
Leading or critical role | Not considered — source PDF |
High salary or remuneration | Not considered — source PDF |
Commercial success in the performing arts | Not considered — source PDF |
Source-cited findings recorded in review
claim: The petition sought EB-1A classification for an educator/activist in end-of-life choices.; evidence_pages: 2; 5
claim: The AAO withdrew the director’s adverse finding on published material, but found award evidence and original-contribution evidence insufficient; it also rejected the scholarly-authorship and artistic-display claims.; evidence_pages: 7; 8; 9; 10; 11; 13
claim: The AAO conducted final-merits review and dismissed the appeal.; evidence_pages: 15; 16; 17
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: Eligible with caveats
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Awards research
Membership research
Published material about the person research
Judging the work of others research
Original contributions of major significance research
Scholarly authorship research
Artistic display or showcases research
Leading or critical role research
High salary or remuneration research
Commercial success in the performing arts research
Teaching sector research
Final Merits research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.