AAO research
EB-1A appeal disposition — AAO decision JAN112006_08B2203: Appeal summarily dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.
Decision summary: AAO decision JAN112006_08B2203: Appeal summarily dismissed. Failure to identify specific erroneous law/fact and lack of substantive appellate submission.
Source limitation: The review record contains a source hold or limitation. Read the limitation below before relying on any case detail; unresolved facts are not treated as findings.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | JAN112006_08B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | January 11, 2006 |
Classification / field stated in source | EB-1A immigrant petition, INA §203(b)(1)(A) |
Procedural posture | Self-represented appeal summarily dismissed for failure to address denial reasons |
Operative disposition | Appeal summarily dismissed. |
Final-merits status | Not reached |
What the AAO decision addressed
Failure to identify specific erroneous law/fact and lack of substantive appellate submission.
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | Not reached — source PDF |
Membership | Not reached |
Published material about the person | Not reached — source PDF |
Judging the work of others | Not reached |
Original contributions of major significance | Not reached |
Scholarly authorship | Not reached |
Artistic display or showcases | Not reached |
Leading or critical role | Not reached |
High salary or remuneration | Not reached |
Commercial success in the performing arts | Not reached |
Source holds and limits
["Do not present the source as an AAO finding against any particular criterion.", "Director’s general acclaim conclusion is not category-specific."]
Specific caveats recorded by the reviewer
Do not present the source as an AAO finding against any particular criterion.
Director’s general acclaim conclusion is not category-specific.
Source-cited findings recorded in review
claim: Document is dated January 11, 2006; case EAC 05 058 50350; EB-1A petition.; pages: 1
claim: Director found sustained acclaim not established in general terms; no criterion outcomes are named.; pages: 2
claim: Appellate submission contained no arguments or evidence addressing regulatory criteria; petitioner indicated he would not submit a separate brief/evidence.; pages: 2
claim: AAO dismissed because petitioner did not address denial reasons or provide additional evidence.; pages: 2
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: {'fit': 'narrow procedural explainer', 'reason': 'Procedural summary-dismissal example only.'}
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Membership research
Judging the work of others research
Original contributions of major significance research
Scholarly authorship research
Artistic display or showcases research
Leading or critical role research
High salary or remuneration research
Commercial success in the performing arts research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.