AAO research
EB-1A three-criterion threshold — AAO decision JAN102025_03B2203: Appeal dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.
Decision summary: AAO decision JAN102025_03B2203: Appeal dismissed. The review record does not provide a normalized explanation of the disposition. Consult the cited source pages.
Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.
Scope classification from review: in_scope_procedural_eb1a_decision. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | JAN102025_03B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | 2025-01-10 |
Classification / field stated in source | Classification not stated in the normalized review fields |
Procedural posture | AAO_posture: Appeal of Nebraska Service Center denial; AAO dismissed the appeal.; citation_pages: 1; 2; 3; 4; 5; classification: Appeal of Nebraska Service Center denial; AAO dismissed the appeal.; director_findings: As distinguished in the source-specific analysis and disposition. |
Operative disposition | {'outcome': 'Appeal dismissed.', 'basis': 'AAO addressed the statutory intent-to-continue-work and substantial-prospective-benefit requirements and the award evidence. It found the petitioner had not met the minimum initial evidentiary criteria; the diploma/title was not shown to be a nationally or internationally recognized award. Appeal dismissed.', 'citation_pages': [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]} |
Final-merits status | AAO addressed the statutory intent-to-continue-work and substantial-prospective-benefit requirements and the award evidence. It found the petitioner had not met the minimum initial evidentiary criteria; the diploma/title was not shown to be a nationally or internationally recognized award. Appeal dismissed. |
What the AAO decision addressed
The review record does not provide a normalized explanation of the disposition. Consult the cited source pages.
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | Not met — source PDF |
Membership | Not considered — source PDF |
Published material about the person | Not considered — source PDF |
Judging the work of others | Not considered — source PDF |
Original contributions of major significance | Not considered — source PDF |
Scholarly authorship | Not considered — source PDF |
Artistic display or showcases | Not coded — source PDF |
Leading or critical role | Not considered — source PDF |
High salary or remuneration | Not considered — source PDF |
Commercial success in the performing arts | Not considered — source PDF |
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: {'eligible_for_narrow_comparison': True, 'fit': 'Narrow comparison for logistics consultants and the separate intent/benefit requirements; award/title claims and initial criteria threshold.', 'caveats': 'Nonprecedent and fact-specific. Do not conflate demonstrated intent/benefit with satisfaction of the initial criteria or final merits.'}
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
Open the official USCIS decision PDF. Page-specific citations were not available in the normalized row.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Threshold research
Final Merits research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.