AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision JAN102024_01B2203: Published material about the person

AAO EB-1A decision JAN102024_01B2203: Published material about the person

EB-1A published material about the person — AAO decision JAN102024_01B2203: Appeal dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official…

Decision summary: The AAO Appeal dismissed The AAO expressly reserved the artistic-display issue and stated that it need not provide a final-merits determination after finding fewer than three criteria. It separately offered aggregate discussion.

Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.

Scope classification from review: The source identifies an EB-1A Form I-140 petition under INA §203(b)(1)(A).. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

JAN102024_01B2203

Decision date as printed

2024-01-10

Classification / field stated in source

EB-1A extraordinary ability under INA §203(b)(1)(A)

Procedural posture

Nonprecedent AAO de novo appeal of Nebraska Service Center EB-1A denial; appeal dismissed.

Operative disposition

Appeal dismissed

Final-merits status

The AAO expressly reserved the artistic-display issue and stated that it need not provide a final-merits determination after finding fewer than three criteria. It separately offered aggregate discussion.

What the AAO decision addressed

The AAO expressly reserved the artistic-display issue and stated that it need not provide a final-merits determination after finding fewer than three criteria. It separately offered aggregate discussion.

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

Not considered — source PDF

Membership

Not considered — source PDF

Published material about the person

Not met — p. 2, p. 3, p. 4

Judging the work of others

met — p. 2

Original contributions of major significance

Not met — p. 4, p. 5

Scholarly authorship

Not considered — source PDF

Artistic display or showcases

Not reached — p. 7, p. 8

Leading or critical role

Not met — p. 6, p. 7

High salary or remuneration

Not considered — source PDF

Commercial success in the performing arts

Not considered — source PDF

Source-cited findings recorded in review

  • claim: The petitioner is a makeup artist; the Director found judging met, and the AAO did not disturb that finding.; pages: 1; 2

  • claim: Articles, translations, circulation evidence and internet metrics did not establish qualifying published material about the petitioner in major media.; pages: 2; 3; 4

  • claim: The record did not establish original contributions of major significance in makeup artistry or the beauty industry.; pages: 4; 5

  • claim: The evidence did not establish leading/critical roles for the petitioner’s own studio, clients, or productions.; pages: 6; 7

  • claim: The AAO reserved the artistic-showcase criterion because fewer than three criteria could be met.; pages: 7; 8

  • claim: The AAO said it need not conduct formal final merits but gave an aggregate advisory assessment; appeal dismissed.; pages: 8

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: Eligible for individual case discussion

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Awards research

  • Membership research

  • Published material about the person research

  • Judging the work of others research

  • Original contributions of major significance research

  • Scholarly authorship research

  • Artistic display or showcases research

  • Leading or critical role research

  • High salary or remuneration research

  • Commercial success in the performing arts research

  • Performance sector research

  • Final Merits research

  • Remand research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for JAN102024_01B2203