AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision JAN102023_04B2203: Awards

AAO EB-1A decision JAN102023_04B2203: Awards

EB-1A awards — AAO decision JAN102023_04B2203: dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.

Decision summary: AAO decision JAN102023_04B2203: dismissed. The AAO rejected the original-contribution and high-salary claims, finding insufficient proof of field-wide impact and appropriate salary comparisons. The petition did not meet three criteria and the appeal was dismissed.

Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.

Scope classification from review: Complete EB-1A AAO decision or related proceeding reviewed from assigned source PDF; no publication or CMS changes.. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

JAN102023_04B2203

Decision date as printed

2023-01-10

Classification / field stated in source

Nonprecedent AAO EB-1A appellate or related proceeding

Procedural posture

Appeal of Texas Service Center denial of Form I-140 EB-1A petition.

Operative disposition

dismissed

Final-merits status

Not reached; fewer than three criteria established; aggregate record did not show sustained acclaim.

What the AAO decision addressed

The AAO rejected the original-contribution and high-salary claims, finding insufficient proof of field-wide impact and appropriate salary comparisons. The petition did not meet three criteria and the appeal was dismissed.

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

waived — p. 2

Membership

waived — p. 2

Published material about the person

waived — p. 2

Judging the work of others

met — p. 2

Original contributions of major significance

Not met — p. 3, p. 4

Scholarly authorship

met — p. 2

Artistic display or showcases

Not considered — source PDF

Leading or critical role

Not considered — source PDF

High salary or remuneration

Not met — p. 4, p. 5

Commercial success in the performing arts

Not considered — source PDF

Source-cited findings recorded in review

  • claim: The AAO rejected the original-contribution and high-salary claims, finding insufficient proof of field-wide impact and appropriate salary comparisons. The petition did not meet three criteria and the appeal was dismissed.; pages: 2; 6

  • claim: Decision date, caption/classification and field verified from the source PDF.; pages: 1

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: caveats: The AAO expressly affirms judging and scholarly-authorship criteria and deems award, membership and published-material claims waived; it rejects original contributions and high salary.; eligible_for_aggregation: True; eligible_for_individual_decision_page: True; reason: Researcher comparison on demonstrating implementation and independent field-wide impact, and on occupation-specific compensation comparisons.; recommended_use: A source-cited decision page or tightly scoped aggregation preserving date, field, procedural posture, exact criterion states and whether final merits was reached.

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Awards research

  • Membership research

  • Published material about the person research

  • Judging the work of others research

  • Original contributions of major significance research

  • Scholarly authorship research

  • Artistic display or showcases research

  • Leading or critical role research

  • High salary or remuneration research

  • Commercial success in the performing arts research

  • Medicine sector research

  • Final Merits research

  • Waiv research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for JAN102023_04B2203