AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision JAN102012_06B2203: Motions to reopen

AAO EB-1A decision JAN102012_06B2203: Motions to reopen

EB-1A motions to reopen — AAO decision JAN102012_06B2203: Second appeal rejected. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.

Decision summary: AAO decision JAN102012_06B2203: Second appeal rejected. AAO has no appellate jurisdiction over its own decisions, and the filing did not identify itself as a motion to reopen or reconsider.

Source limitation: The review record contains a source hold or limitation. Read the limitation below before relying on any case detail; unresolved facts are not treated as findings.

Scope classification from review: in_scope_eb1a_procedural_record. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

JAN102012_06B2203

Decision date as printed

January 10, 2012

Classification / field stated in source

EB-1A under INA section 203(b)(1)(A).

Procedural posture

This is a second appeal after AAO summarily dismissed the first appeal for failure to specify error and then denied a request to reopen after finding the claimed mailing/submission error unsupported by evidence. Counsel filed another appeal from AAO’s own decision; filing did not indicate a motion. AAO says it lacks appellate jurisdiction over its own decisions.

Operative disposition

Second appeal rejected.

Final-merits status

not reached

What the AAO decision addressed

AAO has no appellate jurisdiction over its own decisions, and the filing did not identify itself as a motion to reopen or reconsider.

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

not considered

Membership

not considered

Published material about the person

not considered

Judging the work of others

not considered

Original contributions of major significance

not considered

Scholarly authorship

not considered

Artistic display or showcases

not considered

Leading or critical role

not considered

High salary or remuneration

not considered

Commercial success in the performing arts

not considered

Source holds and limits

["Underlying eligibility and criterion evidence are not decided in this second-appeal decision."]

Specific caveats recorded by the reviewer

  • Underlying eligibility and criterion evidence are not decided in this second-appeal decision.

Source-cited findings recorded in review

  • p. 1 shows Jan. 10, 2012 and EB-1A petition.

  • p. 2 recounts first appeal and reopening request, jurisdiction over AAO decisions, absence of motion designation, and rejection.

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: Only aggregate by verified procedural mechanism and preserve distinctions between untimely appeal, motion jurisdiction/filing, summary dismissal, representative standing, and withdrawal/abandonment. Do not treat procedure-only records as criterion outcomes. Exclude source-held records from publication/comparison pending reconciliation.

Editorial use note: May be summarized as a procedural record with page citations; do not imply criterion merits.

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Awards research

  • Membership research

  • Published material about the person research

  • Judging the work of others research

  • Original contributions of major significance research

  • Scholarly authorship research

  • Artistic display or showcases research

  • Leading or critical role research

  • High salary or remuneration research

  • Commercial success in the performing arts research

  • Summary Dismissal research

  • Untimely research

  • Withdrawal research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for JAN102012_06B2203