AAO research
EB-1A awards — AAO decision JAN102008_03B2203: Appeal dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.
Decision summary: The AAO Appeal dismissed AAO found scholarly authorship and a leading/critical role in the new distinguished healthcare organization met; other discussed criteria failed, including salary. It reviewed the aggregate and found acclaim insufficient; the criteria count/sequence is not stated as a modern formal final-merits step.
Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.
Scope classification from review: Complete printed AAO Form I-140 EB-1A source; identity and posture checked against opening page(s).. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | JAN102008_03B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | January 10, 2008 |
Classification / field stated in source | Form I-140 EB-1A extraordinary-ability petition under INA §203(b)(1)(A). |
Procedural posture | Appeal of Nebraska Service Center EB-1A denial; dismissed. |
Operative disposition | Appeal dismissed |
Final-merits status | AAO assessed the record overall and found the petitioner was not distinguished to the degree required; it did not label a modern separate final-merits step. |
What the AAO decision addressed
AAO found scholarly authorship and a leading/critical role in the new distinguished healthcare organization met; other discussed criteria failed, including salary. It reviewed the aggregate and found acclaim insufficient; the criteria count/sequence is not stated as a modern formal final-merits step.
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | |
Membership | Not met — p. 5 |
Published material about the person | Not considered — source PDF |
Judging the work of others | Not met — p. 6 |
Original contributions of major significance | |
Scholarly authorship | met — p. 9 |
Artistic display or showcases | Not considered — source PDF |
Leading or critical role | met — p. 10 |
High salary or remuneration | |
Commercial success in the performing arts | Not considered — source PDF |
Source-cited findings recorded in review
claim: Petitioner worked as a systems analyst at Siemens and was hired shortly before filing as Director of Applied Clinical Informatics for a healthcare organization.; pages: 3; 6; 10
claim: Authorship and leading/critical role met; awards, membership, judging, contributions, and comparative salary claims did not.; pages: 4; 10
claim: AAO found the record did not show sustained acclaim/top-of-field standing and dismissed the appeal.; pages: 11
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: Eligible with caveats
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Awards research
Membership research
Published material about the person research
Judging the work of others research
Original contributions of major significance research
Scholarly authorship research
Artistic display or showcases research
Leading or critical role research
High salary or remuneration research
Commercial success in the performing arts research
Medicine sector research
Final Merits research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.