AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision JAN082020_02B2203: Awards

AAO EB-1A decision JAN082020_02B2203: Awards

EB-1A awards — AAO decision JAN082020_02B2203: Appeal dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.

Decision summary: The AAO Appeal dismissed Three initial criteria were met, but the final merits determination found the totality insufficient for sustained acclaim or top-of-field standing.

Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.

Scope classification from review: The source is an AAO decision on a Form I-140 EB-1A extraordinary-ability petition; unusual field and procedural distinctions are preserved in the facts/caveats.. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

JAN082020_02B2203

Decision date as printed

January 8, 2020

Classification / field stated in source

Form I-140 EB-1A extraordinary-ability decision under INA §203(b)(1)(A).

Procedural posture

Appeal after director denied the petition and denied successive motions to reopen/reconsider; appeal dismissed.

Operative disposition

Appeal dismissed

Final-merits status

Express final-merits determination finds regional/home-state acclaim and a limited period of national recognition, but insufficient sustained acclaim/top-of-field standing.

What the AAO decision addressed

Three initial criteria were met, but the final merits determination found the totality insufficient for sustained acclaim or top-of-field standing.

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

met — p. 3

Membership

met — p. 3

Published material about the person

met — p. 4

Judging the work of others

Not met — p. 3

Original contributions of major significance

Not met — p. 6

Scholarly authorship

Not considered — source PDF

Artistic display or showcases

Not reached — p. 3

Leading or critical role

Not met — p. 7, p. 8

High salary or remuneration

Not considered — source PDF

Commercial success in the performing arts

Not considered — source PDF

Source-cited findings recorded in review

  • claim: The petitioner was a former member of Mexican junior and senior national teams from 2002 to 2012 and began coaching in 2014.; pages: 2

  • claim: The AAO found awards, qualifying national-team membership, and major-media articles met the three threshold criteria; it withdrew the director’s favorable judging finding because there was no evidence of actual judging by the January 2017 filing date.; pages: 3; 4

  • claim: Final merits found a short period of national acclaim during 2010–2012 and home-state recognition, but not sustained acclaim or top-of-field standing as a gymnast or coach.; pages: 5; 6; 7; 8

  • claim: Hand-painted apparatus designs were not shown to be major-significance contributions; coaching evidence did not establish a leading or critical role or sustained acclaim as a coach.; pages: 6; 7; 8

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: Eligible for individual case discussion

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Awards research

  • Membership research

  • Published material about the person research

  • Judging the work of others research

  • Original contributions of major significance research

  • Scholarly authorship research

  • Artistic display or showcases research

  • Leading or critical role research

  • High salary or remuneration research

  • Commercial success in the performing arts research

  • Athletics sector research

  • Threshold research

  • Final Merits research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for JAN082020_02B2203