AAO research
EB-1A remand — AAO decision FEB282018_01B2203: Appeal dismissed; petition denied. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.
Decision summary: AAO decision FEB282018_01B2203: Appeal dismissed; petition denied. The review record does not provide a normalized explanation of the disposition. Consult the cited source pages.
Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.
Scope classification from review: in_scope_procedural_eb1a_decision. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | FEB282018_01B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | 2018-02-28 |
Classification / field stated in source | Classification not stated in the normalized review fields |
Procedural posture | AAO_posture: Matter of M-L-A-, nonprecedent appeal from Texas Service Center denial. The petitioner managed a hookah lounge. AAO found the record did not establish a qualifying one-time achievement or at least three criteria. It specifically found the cited award was not shown nationally/internationally recognized, association membership did not require outstanding achievements, and evidence did not establish a leading/critical role at a distinguished organization. AAO also stated the aggregate record did not support the required level of expertise.; citation_pages: 1; 2; 3; 4; classification: Appeal dismissed_initial_criteria_not_established; director_findings: Matter of M-L-A-, nonprecedent appeal from Texas Service Center denial. The petitioner managed a hookah lounge. AAO found the record did not establish a qualifying one-time achievement or at least three criteria. It specifically found the cited award was not shown nationally/internationally recognized, association membership did not require outstanding achievements, and evidence did not establish a leading/critical role at a distinguished organization. AAO also stated the aggregate record did not support the required level of expertise. |
Operative disposition | {'outcome': 'Appeal dismissed; petition denied.', 'basis': 'The petitioner did not provide a qualifying major award or evidence satisfying at least three criteria; the award, membership, and leading-role evidence were insufficient.', 'citation_pages': [1, 2, 3, 4]} |
Final-merits status | Not met |
What the AAO decision addressed
The review record does not provide a normalized explanation of the disposition. Consult the cited source pages.
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | Not met — source PDF |
Membership | Not met — source PDF |
Published material about the person | Not reached — source PDF |
Judging the work of others | Not reached — source PDF |
Original contributions of major significance | Not reached — source PDF |
Scholarly authorship | Not reached — source PDF |
Artistic display or showcases | Not coded — source PDF |
Leading or critical role | Not met — source PDF |
High salary or remuneration | Not reached — source PDF |
Commercial success in the performing arts | Not reached — source PDF |
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: {'fit': 'hookah_lounge_award_membership_leading_role', 'aggregation_valid': True, 'use': 'Useful narrow source for award, association-membership, and leading-role evidence in this particular occupation and record; it also contains an aggregate expertise finding. Avoid generalizing beyond its facts.', 'do_not_claim': ['Do not characterize a procedural dismissal, rejection, or remand as approval or a completed merits adjudication.', 'Do not infer criterion outcomes beyond those expressly stated.', 'Do not treat explicitly nonprecedent decisions as binding authority.', 'Do not publish or compare the two identity-held records until the cover/body classification discrepancy is reconciled.'], 'caveat': 'Use only source-specific claims with citations and distinguish current holdings from prior decisions; identity-held records must not be used for publication or aggregation.'}
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
Open the official USCIS decision PDF. Page-specific citations were not available in the normalized row.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Remand research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.