AAO research
EB-1A awards — AAO decision FEB282008_01B2203: Appeal dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.
Decision summary: The AAO Appeal dismissed The AAO distinguishes the proposed horse-trainer role from riding, rejects the award and remaining criterion evidence as insufficient, and dismisses without reaching final merits.
Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.
Scope classification from review: Physical source is an AAO/SCOPS decision on an EB-1A extraordinary-ability Form I-140 appeal.. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | FEB282008_01B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | February 28, 2008 |
Classification / field stated in source | EB-1A extraordinary ability (Form I-140) |
Procedural posture | Nonprecedent AAO appeal from denial of EB-1A petition; appeal dismissed. |
Operative disposition | Appeal dismissed |
Final-merits status | Conclusion addresses failure to establish the regulatory criteria; no final-merits analysis. |
What the AAO decision addressed
The AAO distinguishes the proposed horse-trainer role from riding, rejects the award and remaining criterion evidence as insufficient, and dismisses without reaching final merits.
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | |
Membership | Not met — p. 10 |
Published material about the person | Not met — p. 10 |
Judging the work of others | Not considered — source PDF |
Original contributions of major significance | Not met — p. 11 |
Scholarly authorship | Not coded — source PDF |
Artistic display or showcases | Not considered — source PDF |
Leading or critical role | Not considered — source PDF |
High salary or remuneration | Not considered — source PDF |
Commercial success in the performing arts | Not coded — source PDF |
Source-cited findings recorded in review
claim: The petitioner seeks to continue as a “head horse trainer”; the decision distinguishes horse training from the petitioner’s prior competitive riding.; evidence_pages: 1; 2; 3; 4; 5; 6
claim: The AAO reviews awards, membership, published material, judging, contributions, display, and leading-role criteria and finds the record insufficient to establish the initial three-criterion threshold.; evidence_pages: 7; 8; 9; 10; 11; 12; 13
claim: The appeal is dismissed without final merits because the regulatory criteria threshold is not met.; evidence_pages: 13; 14
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: Eligible with caveats
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Awards research
Membership research
Published material about the person research
Judging the work of others research
Original contributions of major significance research
Artistic display or showcases research
Leading or critical role research
High salary or remuneration research
Athletics sector research
Final Merits research
Revocation research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.