AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision FEB272018_06B2203: Membership

AAO EB-1A decision FEB272018_06B2203: Membership

EB-1A membership — AAO decision FEB272018_06B2203: Appeal dismissed (p. 6). Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.

Decision summary: AAO decision FEB272018_06B2203: Appeal dismissed (p. 6). Membership did not show admission based on outstanding achievements; race coverage was not qualifying media about petitioner; skills and training were not original contributions; participation did not establish qualifying display or critical role. Fewer than three criteria; final merits not reached (pp. 3–6).

Source limitation: The review record contains a source hold or limitation. Read the limitation below before relying on any case detail; unresolved facts are not treated as findings.

Scope classification from review: In scope; verified in source review. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

FEB272018_06B2203

Decision date as printed

February 27, 2018

Classification / field stated in source

EB-1A extraordinary ability in athletics; petitioner is an ultramarathon runner (p. 1).

Procedural posture

Appeal of Nebraska Service Center denial; petitioner claimed membership, published material, original contributions, display and leading/critical role (pp. 1–5).

Operative disposition

Appeal dismissed (p. 6).

Final-merits status

Not coded in the normalized review fields

What the AAO decision addressed

Membership did not show admission based on outstanding achievements; race coverage was not qualifying media about petitioner; skills and training were not original contributions; participation did not establish qualifying display or critical role. Fewer than three criteria; final merits not reached (pp. 3–6).

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

Not coded — source PDF

Membership

not met
Association membership rules and expert-reviewed outstanding achievements were not established (p. 3). — source PDF

Published material about the person

not met
Race/event coverage and runner websites did not establish qualifying major media about petitioner (pp. 3–4). — source PDF

Judging the work of others

Not coded — source PDF

Original contributions of major significance

not met
Letters praised skill/work ethic but did not show major field significance (p. 5). — source PDF

Scholarly authorship

Not coded — source PDF

Artistic display or showcases

Not coded — source PDF

Leading or critical role

not met
Petitioner did not establish leading/critical role for distinguished organizations (pp. 5–6). — source PDF

High salary or remuneration

Not coded — source PDF

Commercial success in the performing arts

Not coded — source PDF

Source holds and limits

"Names/races/orgs redacted; no implication that competing or winning itself is categorically irrelevant."

Source-cited findings recorded in review

  • p1: Matter of R-S-F- cover; ultramarathon runner.; p2: Framework and claimed evidence.; p3: Membership and media analyses.; p4: Published-material criterion rejected.; p5: Original contributions, display and role evidence rejected.; p6: Conclusion and dismissal.

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: Useful endurance-sports example distinguishing athletic participation and praise from evidence of field-wide contributions, qualifying media, association criteria or critical role. Eligible for a narrow negative case summary; keep athletic category and exact failed criteria clear.

Editorial use note: Eligible for a narrow negative case summary; keep athletic category and exact failed criteria clear.

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Membership research

  • Published material about the person research

  • Original contributions of major significance research

  • Leading or critical role research

  • Athletics sector research

  • Final Merits research

  • Coverage research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for FEB272018_06B2203