AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision FEB232012_02B2203: Awards

EB-1A awards — AAO decision FEB232012_02B2203: Appeal dismissed; petition denied. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.

Decision summary: The AAO Appeal dismissed; petition denied Operative order and disposition in the source decision.

Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.

Scope classification from review: Source is an AAO decision concerning an EB-1A Form I-140 petition under INA § 203(b)(1)(A).. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID	FEB232012_02B2203
Decision date as printed	February 23, 2012
Classification / field stated in source	AAO decision concerning a Form I-140 petition for EB-1A classification under INA § 203(b)(1)(A).
Procedural posture	AAO appeal from denial of an EB-1A petition filed June 11, 2010; petitioner worked as a senior staff production engineer.
Operative disposition	Appeal dismissed; petition denied
Final-merits status	The AAO conducted final-merits review and found the record did not establish sustained acclaim or top-of-field standing in petroleum engineering.

What the AAO decision addressed

Operative order and disposition in the source decision.

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion	Source-review status
Awards	Not met — p. 5
Membership	abandoned — p. 6
Published material about the person	Not met — p. 6, p. 7, p. 8
Judging the work of others	met — p. 8, p. 9
Original contributions of major significance	Not met — p. 9, p. 10, p. 11, p. 12, p. 13, p. 14, p. 15, p. 16, p. 17, p. 18, p. 19, p. 20, p. 21
Scholarly authorship	Not met — p. 21, p. 22
Artistic display or showcases	Not considered — source PDF
Leading or critical role	Not met — p. 22
High salary or remuneration	met — p. 22, p. 23
Commercial success in the performing arts	Not considered — source PDF

Source-cited findings recorded in review

claim: The claimed field concerned petroleum production and deepwater completion engineering.; evidence_pages: 5
claim: The AAO found participation in internal company project reviews met judging and found salary evidence met the high-salary criterion, while awards, published material, original contributions, scholarly authorship, and leading role were not established; membership was abandoned.; evidence_pages: 5; 6; 7; 8; 9; 13; 16; 21; 22; 23
claim: The final-merits analysis found the record insufficient and dismissed the appeal.; evidence_pages: 23; 24; 25

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: Eligible with caveats

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

Full-corpus research index
Awards research
Membership research
Published material about the person research
Judging the work of others research
Original contributions of major significance research
Scholarly authorship research
Artistic display or showcases research
Leading or critical role research
High salary or remuneration research
Commercial success in the performing arts research
Computing sector research
Final Merits research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for FEB232012_02B2203