AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision FEB212023_03B2203: Withdrawal and mootness

AAO EB-1A decision FEB212023_03B2203: Withdrawal and mootness

EB-1A withdrawal and mootness — AAO decision FEB212023_03B2203: Director’s decision withdrawn; matter remanded for new decision. Review source status…

Decision summary: The AAO {‘outcome’: ‘Director’s decision withdrawn; matter Remanded for new decision.’, ‘basis’: ‘AAO found the national-team selection may be comparable evidence of association membership requiring outstanding achievements; Director must analyze the evidence and totality/final merits. (pp. 2–4)’, ‘citation_pages’: [1, 2, 3, 4]} The review record does not provide a normalized explanation of the disposition. Consult the cited source pages.

Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.

Scope classification from review: in_scope_procedural_eb1a_decision. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

FEB212023_03B2203

Decision date as printed

2023-02-21

Classification / field stated in source

Classification not stated in the normalized review fields

Procedural posture

AAO_posture: De novo appeal. Director found two criteria met, rejecting membership evidence for national-team membership; AAO found the team selection could be comparable evidence and Remanded for new analysis.; citation_pages: 1; 2; 3; 4; classification: AAO appeal or motion as described in source; director_findings: De novo appeal. Director found two criteria met, rejecting membership evidence for national-team membership; AAO found the team selection could be comparable evidence and Remanded for new analysis.

Operative disposition

{‘outcome’: ‘Director’s decision withdrawn; matter Remanded for new decision.’, ‘basis’: ‘AAO found the national-team selection may be comparable evidence of association membership requiring outstanding achievements; Director must analyze the evidence and totality/final merits. (pp. 2–4)’, ‘citation_pages’: [1, 2, 3, 4]}

Final-merits status

Final merits not decided; Remanded to reassess the criterion and total record.

What the AAO decision addressed

The review record does not provide a normalized explanation of the disposition. Consult the cited source pages.

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

Not reached — source PDF

Membership

Unclear; reserved — source PDF

Published material about the person

Not reached — source PDF

Judging the work of others

Not reached — source PDF

Original contributions of major significance

Not reached — source PDF

Scholarly authorship

Not reached — source PDF

Artistic display or showcases

Not coded — source PDF

Leading or critical role

Not reached — source PDF

High salary or remuneration

Not reached — source PDF

Commercial success in the performing arts

Not reached — source PDF

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: {'eligible_for_narrow_comparison': True, 'fit': 'Narrow fit for national-team selection as comparable evidence; final eligibility remains open.', 'caveats': 'Nonprecedent and fact-specific; preserve procedural posture and do not generalize beyond cited evidence.'}

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

Open the official USCIS decision PDF. Page-specific citations were not available in the normalized row.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Final Merits research

  • Remand research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for FEB212023_03B2203