AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision FEB212014_01B2101: Motions to reopen

AAO EB-1A decision FEB212014_01B2101: Motions to reopen

EB-1A motions to reopen — AAO decision FEB212014_01B2101: Proceeding remanded to the Director for further action and entry of a new decision. Review…

Decision summary: The AAO {‘outcome’: ‘Proceeding Remanded to the Director for further action and entry of a new decision.’, ‘basis’: ‘The AAO addressed the process for reopening/revoking an approved petition and deficiencies in the Director’s notice and consideration of continued eligibility, including future work and evidence concerning published material and artistic display. The order remands rather than entering a final approval or denial.’, ‘citation_pages’: [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]} The review record does not provide a normalized explanation of the disposition. Consult the cited source pages.

Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.

Scope classification from review: in_scope_eb1a_decision_or_related_proceeding. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

FEB212014_01B2101

Decision date as printed

2014-02-21

Classification / field stated in source

Classification not stated in the normalized review fields

Procedural posture

AAO_posture: AAO nonprecedent decision reviewing an approved EB-1A petition following director reopening and revocation proceedings.; citation_pages: 1; 2; 3; 4; 5; classification: AAO nonprecedent decision reviewing an approved EB-1A petition following director reopening and revocation proceedings.

Operative disposition

{‘outcome’: ‘Proceeding Remanded to the Director for further action and entry of a new decision.’, ‘basis’: ‘The AAO addressed the process for reopening/revoking an approved petition and deficiencies in the Director’s notice and consideration of continued eligibility, including future work and evidence concerning published material and artistic display. The order remands rather than entering a final approval or denial.’, ‘citation_pages’: [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]}

Final-merits status

Remand order directs further agency action; the source does not supply a final eligibility disposition or final-merits outcome.

What the AAO decision addressed

The review record does not provide a normalized explanation of the disposition. Consult the cited source pages.

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

Not considered — source PDF

Membership

Not considered — source PDF

Published material about the person

Unclear; reserved — source PDF

Judging the work of others

Not considered — source PDF

Original contributions of major significance

Not considered — source PDF

Scholarly authorship

Not considered — source PDF

Artistic display or showcases

Not coded — source PDF

Leading or critical role

Not considered — source PDF

High salary or remuneration

Not considered — source PDF

Commercial success in the performing arts

Not considered — source PDF

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: {‘eligible_for_narrow_comparison’: True, ‘fit’: ‘Procedural comparison only for revocation/reopening due process, notice, and remand; not a settled merits comparator.’, ‘caveats’: ‘Do not describe as a final approval or denial; the underlying proceeding was Remanded.’}

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

Open the official USCIS decision PDF. Page-specific citations were not available in the normalized row.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Remand research

  • Revocation research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for FEB212014_01B2101