AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision FEB192013_02B2203: Awards

AAO EB-1A decision FEB192013_02B2203: Awards

EB-1A awards — AAO decision FEB192013_02B2203: Appeal dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.

Decision summary: The AAO Appeal dismissed Judging and original contributions fail; authorship fails the plural-articles requirement; awards, published material, display, leading/critical role, and high salary are abandoned. The three-criterion threshold is not met; no final-merits determination.

Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.

Scope classification from review: The source identifies an EB-1A extraordinary-ability Form I-140 petition under INA section 203(b)(1)(A).. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

FEB192013_02B2203

Decision date as printed

2013-02-19

Classification / field stated in source

EB-1A petition; physician/researcher

Procedural posture

Appeal from denial; AAO dismisses.

Operative disposition

Appeal dismissed

Final-merits status

AAO states the petitioner failed the three-types-of-evidence threshold and that a final-merits determination is therefore not undertaken.

What the AAO decision addressed

Judging and original contributions fail; authorship fails the plural-articles requirement; awards, published material, display, leading/critical role, and high salary are abandoned. The three-criterion threshold is not met; no final-merits determination.

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

abandoned — p. 4

Membership

Not considered — source PDF

Published material about the person

abandoned — p. 4

Judging the work of others

Not met — p. 4, p. 5

Original contributions of major significance

Not met — p. 5, p. 6

Scholarly authorship

Not met — p. 7

Artistic display or showcases

abandoned — p. 7

Leading or critical role

abandoned — p. 7

High salary or remuneration

abandoned — p. 7

Commercial success in the performing arts

Not considered — source PDF

Source-cited findings recorded in review

  • claim: The petitioner filed in 2011 and claims extraordinary ability in a medical field; AAO reviews asserted judging, contribution, authorship, and other criteria.; pages: 2; 3; 4

  • claim: AAO finds no evidence of formal judging of others’ work; workplace evaluations do not establish service as a judge.; pages: 4; 5

  • claim: AAO does not accept the contribution claim as established at filing; the asserted citation count included later evidence, and AAO assesses the pre-filing evidence.; pages: 5; 6

  • claim: One qualifying article plus a response and presentations does not satisfy the scholarly-authorship criterion’s plural requirement; several other claims were abandoned.; pages: 7

  • claim: AAO dismisses for failure to satisfy three criteria, expressly distinguishing that threshold from final merits.; pages: 8

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: Eligible for individual case discussion

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Awards research

  • Membership research

  • Published material about the person research

  • Judging the work of others research

  • Original contributions of major significance research

  • Scholarly authorship research

  • Artistic display or showcases research

  • Leading or critical role research

  • High salary or remuneration research

  • Commercial success in the performing arts research

  • Medicine sector research

  • Threshold research

  • Final Merits research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for FEB192013_02B2203