AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision FEB182015_01B2203: Awards

AAO EB-1A decision FEB182015_01B2203: Awards

EB-1A awards — AAO decision FEB182015_01B2203: Appeal or motion dismissed, as stated in the decision. Review source status, procedural posture and the…

Decision summary: AAO decision FEB182015_01B2203: Appeal or motion dismissed, as stated in the decision. Appeal dismissed because petitioner did not establish a major award or three qualifying criteria; final merits was therefore not reached. (pp. 2–9).

Source limitation: The review record contains a source hold or limitation. Read the limitation below before relying on any case detail; unresolved facts are not treated as findings.

Scope classification from review: in_scope_EB1A_source_reviewed. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

FEB182015_01B2203

Decision date as printed

February 18, 2015

Classification / field stated in source

Arts/craft; luthier (maker of string instruments)

Procedural posture

Appeal of service-center denial; AAO appellate review.

Operative disposition

Appeal or motion dismissed, as stated in the decision.

Final-merits status

No final-merits determination; three-criterion threshold was not established. (pp. 8–9)

What the AAO decision addressed

Appeal dismissed because petitioner did not establish a major award or three qualifying criteria; final merits was therefore not reached. (pp. 2–9)

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

not met
Three claimed awards lacked reliable documentation of qualifying recognition/excellence and award selection criteria; foreign-language materials were not sufficiently probative. (pp. 4–5) — source PDF

Membership

Not coded — source PDF

Published material about the person

Not met — source PDF

Judging the work of others

abandoned
Petitioner did not contest the Director’s adverse finding or offer argument on appeal. (p. 6) — source PDF

Original contributions of major significance

not met
Evidence did not establish contributions of major significance to the lutherie field. (pp. 6–7) — source PDF

Scholarly authorship

Not coded — source PDF

Artistic display or showcases

Not coded — source PDF

Leading or critical role

not met
Evidence did not establish a qualifying role for a distinguished organization or establishment. (pp. 7–8) — source PDF

High salary or remuneration

Not coded — source PDF

Commercial success in the performing arts

Not coded — source PDF

Source holds and limits

Source PDF includes OCR/extraction artifacts in some lines; visually inspected page images were used to confirm reading and avoid relying on garbled extraction. (pages throughout)

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: Cited craft-field explainer can show how a luthier maps work to regulatory criteria and why award selection documentation matters.

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

Open the official USCIS decision PDF. Page-specific citations were not available in the normalized row.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Awards research

  • Judging the work of others research

  • Original contributions of major significance research

  • Leading or critical role research

  • Performance sector research

  • Final Merits research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for FEB182015_01B2203