AAO research
EB-1A judging the work of others — AAO decision FEB162011_05B2203: Director’s decision withdrawn; appeal sustained and petition approved. Review source…
Decision summary: AAO decision FEB162011_05B2203: Director’s decision withdrawn; appeal sustained and petition approved. AAO credited national-media articles, judging assignments, and leading/critical broadcasting roles, plus cover stories, books, and a blog with over 60 million visits; totality showed sustained national acclaim and top-of-field standing.
Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.
Scope classification from review: In scope; verified in source review. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | FEB162011_05B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | February 16, 2011 |
Classification / field stated in source | EB-1A arts; sports broadcaster/reporter and soccer commentator |
Procedural posture | Appeal of Nebraska Service Center denial; AAO found at least three initial criteria and made final-merits determination. |
Operative disposition | Director’s decision withdrawn; appeal sustained and petition approved. |
Final-merits status | Not coded in the normalized review fields |
What the AAO decision addressed
AAO credited national-media articles, judging assignments, and leading/critical broadcasting roles, plus cover stories, books, and a blog with over 60 million visits; totality showed sustained national acclaim and top-of-field standing.
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | Not coded — source PDF |
Membership | Not coded — source PDF |
Published material about the person | met — source PDF |
Judging the work of others | met |
Original contributions of major significance | Not coded — source PDF |
Scholarly authorship | Not coded — source PDF |
Artistic display or showcases | Not coded — source PDF |
Leading or critical role | met |
High salary or remuneration | Not coded — source PDF |
Commercial success in the performing arts | Not coded — source PDF |
Source-cited findings recorded in review
Pinpoint physical PDF page citations appear in each criterion basis; page-by-page source coverage follows.
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: Strong favorable sports-media example. Accurate content should anchor acclaim in multiple independent signals (national coverage, judging, broadcast responsibility, books and audience), not traffic alone. eligible_for_editorial_review_with_citations
Editorial use note: eligible_for_editorial_review_with_citations
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
PDF page 3 — Statutory/regulatory extraordinary-ability framework.
PDF page 5 — AAO finds qualifying published material, judging, and leading/critical roles.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Judging the work of others research
Leading or critical role research
Athletics sector research
Performance sector research
Coverage research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.