AAO research
EB-1A published material about the person — AAO decision FEB132024_02B2203: Director decision withdrawn; remanded for a new decision including final…
Decision summary: The AAO director decision withdrawn; Remanded for a new decision including final merits. AAO found articles in professional publications and major media met the published-material criterion, alongside director findings for judging and display. The threshold was met, so the Director must conduct final merits. Other criteria were not reached because at least three were met.
Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.
Scope classification from review: EB-1A appeal; initial criteria threshold met; final merits unresolved on remand.. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | FEB132024_02B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | February 13, 2024 |
Classification / field stated in source | EB-1A appeal; director decision withdrawn and Remanded |
Procedural posture | Director denied for failure to meet three criteria. AAO found director had met two claimed criteria (judging and display) and itself found published-material evidence sufficient. |
Operative disposition | Director decision withdrawn; Remanded for a new decision including final merits. |
Final-merits status | Not decided; Remanded for final-merits review. |
What the AAO decision addressed
AAO found articles in professional publications and major media met the published-material criterion, alongside director findings for judging and display. The threshold was met, so the Director must conduct final merits. Other criteria were not reached because at least three were met.
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | Not reached — source PDF |
Membership | Not reached — source PDF |
Published material about the person | met |
Judging the work of others | met — source PDF |
Original contributions of major significance | Not reached — source PDF |
Scholarly authorship | Not reached — source PDF |
Artistic display or showcases | Not coded — source PDF |
Leading or critical role | Not reached — source PDF |
High salary or remuneration | Not reached — source PDF |
Commercial success in the performing arts | Not reached — source PDF |
Source-cited findings recorded in review
claim: Cover identifies February 13, 2024 appeal by a visual artist.; pages: 1
claim: AAO describes work as illustration and painting and states the director’s denial is withdrawn/Remanded.; pages: 1; 2
claim: Director had found judging and display criteria met; AAO found articles from professional publications and major media satisfied published-material criterion.; pages: 2; 3
claim: AAO concludes three criteria met and remands for a totality/final-merits review.; pages: 3
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: Eligible for published-material and initial-threshold/remand content.
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Published material about the person research
Leading or critical role research
Performance sector research
Threshold research
Final Merits research
Remand research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.