AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision FEB092023_02B2203: Membership

AAO EB-1A decision FEB092023_02B2203: Membership

EB-1A membership — AAO decision FEB092023_02B2203: dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.

Decision summary: AAO decision FEB092023_02B2203: dismissed. Judging was met, but association membership, scholarly authorship and high remuneration were not; display was abandoned and published-material/contributions claims were reserved. Fewer than three criteria.

Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.

Scope classification from review: Source is an AAO EB-1A extraordinary-ability decision or motion involving an AAO EB-1A decision.. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

FEB092023_02B2203

Decision date as printed

Feb. 9, 2023

Classification / field stated in source

EB-1A appellate decision, In Re 24734448

Procedural posture

Appeal of Nebraska Service Center denial; dismissed after threshold review.

Operative disposition

dismissed

Final-merits status

Threshold failed; remaining issues expressly reserved and no formal FMD.

What the AAO decision addressed

Judging was met, but association membership, scholarly authorship and high remuneration were not; display was abandoned and published-material/contributions claims were reserved. Fewer than three criteria.

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

Not coded — source PDF

Membership

Not met — p. 3, p. 4

Published material about the person

Not considered — p. 5

Judging the work of others

met — p. 3

Original contributions of major significance

Not considered — p. 5

Scholarly authorship

Not met — p. 4

Artistic display or showcases

Not coded — source PDF

Leading or critical role

Not coded — source PDF

High salary or remuneration

Not met — p. 5

Commercial success in the performing arts

Not coded — source PDF

Source-cited findings recorded in review

  • claim: The AAO accepted judging of figure-skating competitions but found association requirements did not establish qualifying membership.; pages: 3; 4

  • claim: Authorship/publication and salary evidence did not satisfy their criteria; a two-week 2019 camp contract was not shown to be significantly high remuneration compared with the field.; pages: 4; 5

  • claim: The artistic-display claim was abandoned; published-material and original-contribution issues were reserved after the threshold failure.; pages: 5

  • claim: The appeal was dismissed without formal final merits; the AAO noted the prior motion to reopen did not change the outcome.; pages: 5; 6

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: Eligible for individual case discussion

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Membership research

  • Published material about the person research

  • Judging the work of others research

  • Original contributions of major significance research

  • Scholarly authorship research

  • High salary or remuneration research

  • Athletics sector research

  • Threshold research

  • Translat research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for FEB092023_02B2203