AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision FEB082016_01B2203: Published material about the person

AAO EB-1A decision FEB082016_01B2203: Published material about the person

EB-1A published material about the person — AAO decision FEB082016_01B2203: Appeal sustained; three criteria met and final merits expressly concludes…

Decision summary: AAO decision FEB082016_01B2203: Appeal sustained; three criteria met and final merits expressly concludes top-of-field/sustained acclaim. Substantive approval with final merits reached.

Source limitation: The review record contains a source hold or limitation. Read the limitation below before relying on any case detail; unresolved facts are not treated as findings.

Scope classification from review: In scope; verified in source review. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

FEB082016_01B2203

Decision date as printed

February 8, 2016

Classification / field stated in source

EB-1A extraordinary ability; field as printed: circus performer (motorcycle-sphere act).

Procedural posture

Appeal from Texas Service Center EB-1A denial; circus performer; Director found two criteria; appeal considers critical role.

Operative disposition

Appeal sustained; three criteria met and final merits expressly concludes top-of-field/sustained acclaim.

Final-merits status

reached; extraordinary ability, sustained acclaim and top-of-field established

What the AAO decision addressed

Substantive approval with final merits reached.

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

not considered

Membership

not considered

Published material about the person

met — source PDF

Judging the work of others

not considered

Original contributions of major significance

met — source PDF

Scholarly authorship

not considered

Artistic display or showcases

not considered

Leading or critical role

met — source PDF

High salary or remuneration

not considered

Commercial success in the performing arts

not considered

Source holds and limits

["This is a precedential Matter of decision; summarize only the holding supported by the text.", "Do not generalize the result beyond the issue actually decided."]

Specific caveats recorded by the reviewer

  • This is a precedential Matter of decision; summarize only the holding supported by the text.

  • Do not generalize the result beyond the issue actually decided.

Source-cited findings recorded in review

  • Identity, field and sustained appeal stated (PDF p. 1).

  • Two criteria accepted; critical role issue and evidence (PDF p. 2).

  • Critical role met; threshold met; final merits finds top standing and acclaim (PDF p. 3).

  • Eligibility and prospective benefit; appeal sustained (PDF p. 4).

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: May be grouped only in explicitly labeled cross-case analyses of the same procedural question or criterion; do not combine outcomes into a general approval/denial rule. This decision is a particularly useful comparator for its identified narrow issue.

Editorial use note: Publish as an individual decision summary only with the narrow posture and outcome stated above; exclude from broad grouped conclusions unless the aggregation labels each distinction and caveat.

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Awards research

  • Membership research

  • Published material about the person research

  • Judging the work of others research

  • Original contributions of major significance research

  • Scholarly authorship research

  • Artistic display or showcases research

  • Leading or critical role research

  • High salary or remuneration research

  • Commercial success in the performing arts research

  • Performance sector research

  • Final Merits research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for FEB082016_01B2203