AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision FEB042020_02B2203: Original contributions of major significance

AAO EB-1A decision FEB042020_02B2203: Original contributions of major significance

EB-1A original contributions of major significance — AAO decision FEB042020_02B2203: Appeal dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the…

Decision summary: The AAO Appeal dismissed The petitioner established only one initial criterion according to the Director; the additional original-contributions and leading-role claims failed, leaving fewer than three criteria. Final merits was not reached.

Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.

Scope classification from review: Complete identity-matched AAO decision concerning EB-1A extraordinary-ability eligibility.. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

FEB042020_02B2203

Decision date as printed

2020-02-04

Classification / field stated in source

actor; EB-1A extraordinary-ability petition

Procedural posture

Appeal from denial of EB-1A petition. AAO reviews original contributions and leading/critical role, the two additional criteria claimed on appeal, finds neither met, and does not reach final merits.

Operative disposition

Appeal dismissed

Final-merits status

The petitioner established only one initial criterion according to the Director; the additional original-contributions and leading-role claims failed, leaving fewer than three criteria. Final merits was not reached.

What the AAO decision addressed

The petitioner established only one initial criterion according to the Director; the additional original-contributions and leading-role claims failed, leaving fewer than three criteria. Final merits was not reached.

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

Not considered — source PDF

Membership

Not considered — source PDF

Published material about the person

Not considered — source PDF

Judging the work of others

Not considered — source PDF

Original contributions of major significance

Not met — p. 2, p. 3, p. 4

Scholarly authorship

Not considered — source PDF

Artistic display or showcases

Not considered — source PDF

Leading or critical role

Not met — p. 5, p. 6

High salary or remuneration

Not considered — source PDF

Commercial success in the performing arts

Not considered — source PDF

Source-cited findings recorded in review

  • claim: The petitioner is an actor who sought EB-1A classification; the Director found only one criterion met.; pages: 1; 2

  • claim: AAO reviews claims of original contributions of major significance and a leading/critical role.; pages: 2; 3

  • claim: Letters about acting method, “action vocabulary,” and influence on colleagues did not establish major significance in the field.; pages: 3; 4

  • claim: Role evidence did not establish a leading or critical role for a distinguished organization.; pages: 5; 6

  • claim: The initial threshold remained unmet and AAO dismissed without final-merits review.; pages: 6; 7

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: Eligible for individual case discussion

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Awards research

  • Membership research

  • Published material about the person research

  • Judging the work of others research

  • Original contributions of major significance research

  • Scholarly authorship research

  • Artistic display or showcases research

  • Leading or critical role research

  • High salary or remuneration research

  • Commercial success in the performing arts research

  • Performance sector research

  • Final Merits research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for FEB042020_02B2203