AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision FEB042013_01B2203: Awards

AAO EB-1A decision FEB042013_01B2203: Awards

EB-1A awards — AAO decision FEB042013_01B2203: Appeal dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.

Decision summary: AAO decision FEB042013_01B2203: Appeal dismissed. Claims included awards, association membership, artistic display, and leading/critical role; AAO found no qualifying evidence establishing at least three criteria. It also found the record did not clearly establish continuing work in the field. (pp. 4–12).

Source limitation: The review record contains a source hold or limitation. Read the limitation below before relying on any case detail; unresolved facts are not treated as findings.

Scope classification from review: in_scope_EB1A_source_reviewed. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

FEB042013_01B2203

Decision date as printed

February 4, 2013

Classification / field stated in source

AAO appeal concerning a competitive dancer and dance teacher in Dance Sport. The petitioner also sought to continue work in the field in the United States. (pp. 2–3, 10)

Procedural posture

AAO dismissed the Texas Service Center appeal, withdrawing the Director’s positive finding on one award criterion; it found the threshold unmet and separately discussed continue-work evidence. (pp. 4–9, 10–12)

Operative disposition

Appeal dismissed.

Final-merits status

No separate Kazarian final-merits determination after failing the initial threshold. (pp. 11–12)

What the AAO decision addressed

Claims included awards, association membership, artistic display, and leading/critical role; AAO found no qualifying evidence establishing at least three criteria. It also found the record did not clearly establish continuing work in the field. (pp. 4–12)

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

not met
AAO withdrew the Director’s finding; claimed dance-sport results did not establish awards qualifying under the plain language. (pp. 4–5) — source PDF

Membership

not met
World Dance Council membership/“Competitor” designation did not establish outstanding-achievement membership requirements judged by recognized experts. (pp. 5–6) — source PDF

Published material about the person

Not coded — source PDF

Judging the work of others

Not coded — source PDF

Original contributions of major significance

Not coded — source PDF

Scholarly authorship

Not coded — source PDF

Artistic display or showcases

not met
The record did not establish display of the petitioner’s work at qualifying artistic exhibitions/showcases as applied to dance performance. (pp. 7–8) — source PDF

Leading or critical role

not met
The record did not demonstrate a qualifying critical/leading role for an organization of distinguished reputation. (pp. 8–9) — source PDF

High salary or remuneration

Not coded — source PDF

Commercial success in the performing arts

Not coded — source PDF

Source holds and limits

Hold as dated legal analysis; decision predates current guidance and is non-precedent. Confirm any legal discussion against current binding sources before external explanatory use.

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: If cleared for publication, create a decision-specific, page-cited summary that states the field and procedural posture, distinguishes criteria met/not met/not reached, links the USCIS source PDF, preserves redactions, and clearly labels the decision non-precedent. Potential comparison: Narrow comparison for Dance Sport, including award recognition, federation membership, artistic-display interpretation, organizational role, and continued-work evidence. Historical 2013 non-precedent reasoning must not be presented as current binding policy.

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

Open the official USCIS decision PDF. Page-specific citations were not available in the normalized row.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Awards research

  • Membership research

  • Artistic display or showcases research

  • Leading or critical role research

  • Athletics sector research

  • Performance sector research

  • Teaching sector research

  • Threshold research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for FEB042013_01B2203