AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision FEB032006_09B2203: Appeal disposition

AAO EB-1A decision FEB032006_09B2203: Appeal disposition

EB-1A appeal disposition — AAO decision FEB032006_09B2203: Appeal summarily dismissed for failure to identify specifically an error of law or fact. Review…

Decision summary: AAO decision FEB032006_09B2203: Appeal summarily dismissed for failure to identify specifically an error of law or fact. Director found petitioner had not established continuing ability to pay proffered wage from priority date April 30, 2001. Counsel asserted bank statements and tax return showed assets but did not address the Director’s finding that bank balances were routinely below the proffered wage and did not remain above it for a sustained period.

Scope note: The source review classified this record as outside EB-1A merits scope. It is retained for corpus provenance and must not be used as an EB-1A criterion or eligibility example.

Scope classification from review: out_of_scope_EB3_hold. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

FEB032006_09B2203

Decision date as printed

February 3, 2006

Classification / field stated in source

Skilled worker/professional; restaurant petitioner sought to employ cook specializing in foreign food

Procedural posture

Vermont Service Center Form I-140 under INA §203(b)(3), EB-3 skilled worker/professional; appeal by counsel.

Operative disposition

Appeal summarily dismissed for failure to identify specifically an error of law or fact.

Final-merits status

Not reached

What the AAO decision addressed

Director found petitioner had not established continuing ability to pay proffered wage from priority date April 30, 2001. Counsel asserted bank statements and tax return showed assets but did not address the Director’s finding that bank balances were routinely below the proffered wage and did not remain above it for a sustained period.

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

Not reached — source PDF

Membership

Not reached
The AAO disposition is procedural or mootness-based; current AAO decision did not adjudicate this criterion. — source PDF

Published material about the person

Not reached — source PDF

Judging the work of others

Not reached
The AAO disposition is procedural or mootness-based; current AAO decision did not adjudicate this criterion. — source PDF

Original contributions of major significance

Not reached
The AAO disposition is procedural or mootness-based; current AAO decision did not adjudicate this criterion. — source PDF

Scholarly authorship

Not reached
The AAO disposition is procedural or mootness-based; current AAO decision did not adjudicate this criterion. — source PDF

Artistic display or showcases

Not reached
The AAO disposition is procedural or mootness-based; current AAO decision did not adjudicate this criterion. — source PDF

Leading or critical role

Not reached
The AAO disposition is procedural or mootness-based; current AAO decision did not adjudicate this criterion. — source PDF

High salary or remuneration

Not reached
The AAO disposition is procedural or mootness-based; current AAO decision did not adjudicate this criterion. — source PDF

Commercial success in the performing arts

Not reached
The AAO disposition is procedural or mootness-based; current AAO decision did not adjudicate this criterion. — source PDF

Source holds and limits

details: Source is a section 203(b)(3) skilled worker/professional EB-3 decision, not EB-1A; retain as held/out-of-scope.; status: out_of_scope_classification_mismatch

Specific caveats recorded by the reviewer

  • Source is an EB-3 case despite its folder/assignment placement. Explicitly held out of EB-1A corpus.

Source-cited findings recorded in review

  • claim: Cover date February 3, 2006; petition is explicitly for a skilled worker or professional under INA §203(b), not extraordinary ability.; pages: 1

  • claim: The decision identifies the petitioner as a restaurant seeking a cook, specialty foreign food; Director found ability to pay proffered wage from priority date April 30, 2001 was not established.; pages: 2

  • claim: Counsel asserted bank statements and tax return showed assets but did not specifically identify an error in the Director’s stated balance analysis.; pages: 2

  • claim: AAO summarily dismissed the appeal for failure to identify a specific erroneous conclusion of law or fact.; pages: 2

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: exclude_out_of_scope_EB3_hold

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Membership research

  • Judging the work of others research

  • Original contributions of major significance research

  • Scholarly authorship research

  • Artistic display or showcases research

  • Leading or critical role research

  • High salary or remuneration research

  • Commercial success in the performing arts research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for FEB032006_09B2203