AAO research
EB-1A awards — AAO decision FEB022018_01B2203: Appeal dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.
Decision summary: The AAO Appeal dismissed The AAO found judging, scholarly authorship, and a critical role for the petitioner’s organization met, satisfying the three-criterion threshold, but the totality did not show sustained acclaim or top-of-field standing.
Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.
Scope classification from review: The printed source is a complete AAO Form I-140 EB-1A extraordinary-ability decision.. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | FEB022018_01B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | February 2, 2018 |
Classification / field stated in source | Form I-140 EB-1A extraordinary-ability petition under INA §203(b)(1)(A). |
Procedural posture | Appeal of Nebraska Service Center denial of Form I-140 EB-1A; AAO de novo review; nonprecedent decision; appeal dismissed after final-merits review. |
Operative disposition | Appeal dismissed |
Final-merits status | The AAO expressly proceeded to final merits after finding three criteria and concluded the totality did not establish sustained acclaim or top-of-field standing. |
What the AAO decision addressed
The AAO found judging, scholarly authorship, and a critical role for the petitioner’s organization met, satisfying the three-criterion threshold, but the totality did not show sustained acclaim or top-of-field standing.
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | Not met — p. 7 |
Membership | Not considered — source PDF |
Published material about the person | |
Judging the work of others | |
Original contributions of major significance | |
Scholarly authorship | met — p. 2 |
Artistic display or showcases | Not considered — source PDF |
Leading or critical role | |
High salary or remuneration | |
Commercial success in the performing arts | Not considered — source PDF |
Source-cited findings recorded in review
claim: The beneficiary worked as a data scientist for an agricultural-analytics software company; the director found judging and scholarly authorship met.; pages: 1; 2
claim: The AAO also found a critical role for the petitioner at an organization with a distinguished reputation, reaching three criteria. It rejected the awards, original-contribution, high-salary, and asserted published-material claims.; pages: 2; 3; 7; 8
claim: The AAO conducted final-merits review and found the record—including six documented peer reviews, publications, and company role—insufficient to show sustained acclaim or top-of-field standing.; pages: 3; 4; 8; 9
claim: The appeal was dismissed.; pages: 9
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: Eligible with caveats
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Awards research
Membership research
Published material about the person research
Judging the work of others research
Original contributions of major significance research
Scholarly authorship research
Artistic display or showcases research
Leading or critical role research
High salary or remuneration research
Commercial success in the performing arts research
Computing sector research
Medicine sector research
Threshold research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.