AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision FEB022009_03B2203: Appeal arguments

AAO EB-1A decision FEB022009_03B2203: Appeal arguments

EB-1A appeal arguments — AAO decision FEB022009_03B2203: summary dismissal for failure to identify specific error; no criterion review. Review source…

Decision summary: AAO decision FEB022009_03B2203: summary dismissal for failure to identify specific error; no criterion review.

Source limitation: The review record contains a source hold or limitation. Read the limitation below before relying on any case detail; unresolved facts are not treated as findings.

Scope classification from review: in_scope_eb1a_procedural_record; not an AAO EB-1A criterion/final-merits decision.. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

FEB022009_03B2203

Decision date as printed

February 2, 2009

Classification / field stated in source

AAO EB-1A extraordinary ability in sciences procedural decision.

Procedural posture

Nebraska Service Center denied; AAO appeal. Form I-290B Part 3 left blank, no brief/additional evidence received more than ten months after appeal filed March 4, 2008. AAO summarily dismisses because appeal identifies no specific erroneous factual/legal conclusion under 8 C.F.R. 103.3(a)(1)(v).

Operative disposition

summary dismissal for failure to identify specific error; no criterion review

Final-merits status

not reached

What the AAO decision addressed

summary dismissal for failure to identify specific error; no criterion review

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

not reached

Membership

not reached

Published material about the person

not reached

Judging the work of others

not reached

Original contributions of major significance

not reached

Scholarly authorship

not reached

Artistic display or showcases

not reached

Leading or critical role

not reached

High salary or remuneration

not reached

Commercial success in the performing arts

not reached

Source holds and limits

["No merits analysis. The source identifier and printed date agree; page 1 is an instruction/cover sheet, page 2 is full decision text.", "Any director-level criterion result is reported only as attributed background; it is not an AAO criterion determination."]

Specific caveats recorded by the reviewer

  • No merits analysis. The source identifier and printed date agree; page 1 is an instruction/cover sheet, page 2 is full decision text.

  • Any director-level criterion result is reported only as attributed background; it is not an AAO criterion determination.

Source-cited findings recorded in review

  • p. 2 says Director found no sustained acclaim; appeal blank/no evidence; order dismisses.

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: May be grouped only with like procedural dispositions (summary dismissal for failure to identify error; untimely appeal; mootness after adjustment). Keep separate mechanisms and cite decision-specific sources.

Editorial use note: May be considered for a source-cited procedural reference entry after editorial review; do not frame as a substantive criterion precedent.

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Awards research

  • Membership research

  • Published material about the person research

  • Judging the work of others research

  • Original contributions of major significance research

  • Scholarly authorship research

  • Artistic display or showcases research

  • Leading or critical role research

  • High salary or remuneration research

  • Commercial success in the performing arts research

  • Summary Dismissal research

  • Untimely research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for FEB022009_03B2203