AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision FEB012023_04B2203: Judging the work of others

AAO EB-1A decision FEB012023_04B2203: Judging the work of others

EB-1A judging the work of others — AAO decision FEB012023_04B2203: Director decision withdrawn; matter remanded; AAO expresses no view on ultimate…

Decision summary: The AAO director decision withdrawn; matter Remanded; AAO expresses no view on ultimate eligibility. Procedural remand after criterion threshold already accepted by Director; no merits approval or denial.

Source limitation: The review record contains a source hold or limitation. Read the limitation below before relying on any case detail; unresolved facts are not treated as findings.

Scope classification from review: In scope; verified in source review. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

FEB012023_04B2203

Decision date as printed

February 1, 2023

Classification / field stated in source

EB-1A extraordinary ability; field as printed: researcher in biomedical engineering.

Procedural posture

Appeal after denial based on final merits; de novo review identifies deficient totality analysis and remands for new decision.

Operative disposition

Director decision withdrawn; matter Remanded; AAO expresses no view on ultimate eligibility.

Final-merits status

not reached; Remanded for Director to conduct final-merits determination

What the AAO decision addressed

Procedural remand after criterion threshold already accepted by Director; no merits approval or denial.

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

not considered

Membership

not considered

Published material about the person

not considered

Judging the work of others

met — source PDF

Original contributions of major significance

met — source PDF

Scholarly authorship

met — source PDF

Artistic display or showcases

not considered

Leading or critical role

not considered

High salary or remuneration

not considered

Commercial success in the performing arts

not considered

Source holds and limits

["Nonprecedent decisions are fact-specific and do not create binding agency policy.", "Do not claim that a remand means the petitioner ultimately qualified."]

Specific caveats recorded by the reviewer

  • Nonprecedent decisions are fact-specific and do not create binding agency policy.

  • Do not claim that a remand means the petitioner ultimately qualified.

Source-cited findings recorded in review

  • Identity, appeal posture and remand announced (PDF p. 1).

  • Director accepted five criteria; appeal concerns totality/final-merits explanation (PDF p. 2).

  • AAO finds deficient final-merits analysis and remands without opinion on ultimate resolution (PDF p. 3).

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: May be grouped only in explicitly labeled cross-case analyses of the same procedural question or criterion; do not combine outcomes into a general approval/denial rule. Its fact pattern, motion posture, and field should remain visible in any comparison.

Editorial use note: Publish as an individual decision summary only with the narrow posture and outcome stated above; exclude from broad grouped conclusions unless the aggregation labels each distinction and caveat.

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Awards research

  • Membership research

  • Published material about the person research

  • Judging the work of others research

  • Original contributions of major significance research

  • Scholarly authorship research

  • Artistic display or showcases research

  • Leading or critical role research

  • High salary or remuneration research

  • Commercial success in the performing arts research

  • Computing sector research

  • Medicine sector research

  • Threshold research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for FEB012023_04B2203