AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision DEC282020_01B2203

Include a complete, well‑documented factual record in an EB‑1A petition; otherwise the AAO may fall back to posture and never reach a merits analysis. Insufficient factual record – many fact paragraphs were skipped; No merits analysis performed The decision contains no field, criteria, or concrete e

Decision Snapshot

Field Value --- --- Decision ID DEC282020_01B2203 Decision date not stated in the extraction Outcome other Field or occupation Not stated in the extracted decision plan. Final merits discussed No / not stated

Criteria Discussed

Not stated in the extracted decision plan.

Criteria Accepted

Not stated in the extracted decision plan.

Criteria Rejected

Not stated in the extracted decision plan.

Core Lesson

Include a complete, well‑documented factual record in an EB‑1A petition; otherwise the AAO may fall back to posture and never reach a merits analysis.

Evidence Issue

Insufficient factual record – many fact paragraphs were skipped
No merits analysis performed

How This Connects

This decision is part of Extraordinary's AAO EB-1A corpus. It is exposed as a structured decision card so readers, search engines, and AI search systems can connect the decision to broader EB-1A evidence patterns.

Source Note

Non-precedent AAO decisions are used as evidence examples. They are not binding authority and do not predict any individual case.