AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision DEC212023_01B2203: Appeal disposition

AAO EB-1A decision DEC212023_01B2203: Appeal disposition

EB-1A appeal disposition — AAO decision DEC212023_01B2203: Appeal dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.

Decision summary: AAO decision DEC212023_01B2203: Appeal dismissed. The review record does not provide a normalized explanation of the disposition. Consult the cited source pages.

Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.

Scope classification from review: in_scope_eb1a_decision_or_related_proceeding. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

DEC212023_01B2203

Decision date as printed

2023-12-21

Classification / field stated in source

Classification not stated in the normalized review fields

Procedural posture

AAO_posture: Appeal of Nebraska Service Center denial of Form I-140 EB-1A petition.; citation_pages: 2; 3; 4; classification: Appeal of Nebraska Service Center denial of Form I-140 EB-1A petition.

Operative disposition

{'outcome': 'Appeal dismissed.', 'basis': 'The AAO found the claimed competition awards were not shown to be nationally or internationally recognized and the association evidence did not establish that outstanding achievements were required for membership. The three-criterion threshold was not met.', 'citation_pages': [2, 3, 4, 5]}

Final-merits status

Fewer than three criteria established; final merits not reached.

What the AAO decision addressed

The review record does not provide a normalized explanation of the disposition. Consult the cited source pages.

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

Not met — source PDF

Membership

Not met — source PDF

Published material about the person

Not considered — source PDF

Judging the work of others

Not considered — source PDF

Original contributions of major significance

Not considered — source PDF

Scholarly authorship

Not considered — source PDF

Artistic display or showcases

Not coded — source PDF

Leading or critical role

Not considered — source PDF

High salary or remuneration

Not considered — source PDF

Commercial success in the performing arts

Not considered — source PDF

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: {'eligible_for_narrow_comparison': True, 'fit': 'Narrow martial-arts comparison on award recognition and association membership criteria.', 'caveats': 'Nonprecedent; findings turn on the competitions and association documentation in this record.'}

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

Open the official USCIS decision PDF. Page-specific citations were not available in the normalized row.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Threshold research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for DEC212023_01B2203