AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision DEC212015_02B2203: Judging the work of others

AAO EB-1A decision DEC212015_02B2203: Judging the work of others

EB-1A judging the work of others — AAO decision DEC212015_02B2203: Appeal dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.

Decision summary: The AAO Appeal dismissed The petitioner established judging and scholarly authorship but not original contributions of major significance; the initial three-criterion threshold was not met, so final merits was not reached.

Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.

Scope classification from review: Complete identity-matched AAO decision concerning EB-1A or EB-1B extraordinary-ability eligibility.. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

DEC212015_02B2203

Decision date as printed

2015-12-21

Classification / field stated in source

physician and researcher in cardiovascular medicine; EB-1A extraordinary-ability petition

Procedural posture

Appeal from denial of EB-1A petition. AAO agrees the judging and scholarly-authorship criteria are met, but finds original contributions of major significance not established; fewer than three criteria means no final-merits determination.

Operative disposition

Appeal dismissed

Final-merits status

The petitioner established judging and scholarly authorship but not original contributions of major significance; the initial three-criterion threshold was not met, so final merits was not reached.

What the AAO decision addressed

The petitioner established judging and scholarly authorship but not original contributions of major significance; the initial three-criterion threshold was not met, so final merits was not reached.

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

Not considered — source PDF

Membership

Not considered — source PDF

Published material about the person

Not considered — source PDF

Judging the work of others

met — p. 2, p. 3

Original contributions of major significance

Not met — p. 3, p. 4, p. 5, p. 6

Scholarly authorship

met — p. 6

Artistic display or showcases

Not considered — source PDF

Leading or critical role

Not considered — source PDF

High salary or remuneration

Not considered — source PDF

Commercial success in the performing arts

Not considered — source PDF

Source-cited findings recorded in review

  • claim: The petitioner is a physician and researcher in cardiovascular medicine.; pages: 1

  • claim: AAO agrees the petitioner meets the judging criterion based on review activity and the scholarly-authorship criterion based on authored articles.; pages: 2; 3; 6

  • claim: Citation records, published coverage, and expert letters do not establish original contributions of major significance.; pages: 3; 4; 5; 6

  • claim: Because fewer than three criteria were established, AAO did not reach final merits and dismissed.; pages: 6; 7

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: Eligible for individual case discussion

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Awards research

  • Membership research

  • Published material about the person research

  • Judging the work of others research

  • Original contributions of major significance research

  • Scholarly authorship research

  • Artistic display or showcases research

  • Leading or critical role research

  • High salary or remuneration research

  • Commercial success in the performing arts research

  • Medicine sector research

  • Threshold research

  • Final Merits research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for DEC212015_02B2203