AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision DEC202024_02B2203: Awards

AAO EB-1A decision DEC202024_02B2203: Awards

EB-1A awards — AAO decision DEC202024_02B2203: Appeal dismissed (p. 5). Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.

Decision summary: AAO decision DEC202024_02B2203: Appeal dismissed (p. 5). Awards and judging were not met; the other two appealed claims were waived. AAO concluded petitioner would not meet three criteria even if those additional claims were established, and reserved them. Final merits was not reached (pp. 1–5).

Source limitation: The review record contains a source hold or limitation. Read the limitation below before relying on any case detail; unresolved facts are not treated as findings.

Scope classification from review: In scope; verified in source review. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

DEC202024_02B2203

Decision date as printed

December 20, 2024

Classification / field stated in source

EB-1A extraordinary ability in the arts; petitioner is a professional ballroom dancer and dance instructor (pp. 1–2).

Procedural posture

Appeal of Nebraska Service Center denial. Petitioner claimed awards, published material, judging and display; footnote states published-material/display criteria were not included in initial filing or RFE response and are waived on appeal (pp. 1–3).

Operative disposition

Appeal dismissed (p. 5).

Final-merits status

Not coded in the normalized review fields

What the AAO decision addressed

Awards and judging were not met; the other two appealed claims were waived. AAO concluded petitioner would not meet three criteria even if those additional claims were established, and reserved them. Final merits was not reached (pp. 1–5).

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

not met
Awards were not shown nationally/internationally recognized; competition scope/recognition and award evidence were insufficient (p. 3). — source PDF

Membership

Not coded — source PDF

Published material about the person

waived
Not included in initial filing or RFE response and not considered on appeal (p. 1 fn. 1). — source PDF

Judging the work of others

Not met — source PDF

Original contributions of major significance

Not coded — source PDF

Scholarly authorship

Not coded — source PDF

Artistic display or showcases

Not coded — source PDF

Leading or critical role

Not coded — source PDF

High salary or remuneration

Not coded — source PDF

Commercial success in the performing arts

Not coded — source PDF

Source holds and limits

"Petitioner/events redacted; claims about the dance community are not findings about the field generally."

Source-cited findings recorded in review

  • physical p1: Cover identifies ballroom dancer/instructor and appeal.; physical p2: AAO states awards and judging claims; media/display are waived; standard and dance-community background.; physical p3: Awards criterion analysis.; physical p4: Judging evidence and inconsistent dates analyzed.; physical p5: Waived criteria and conclusion; final merits reserved; dismissal.

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: Useful recent example for source consistency and claim waiver; not a complete evaluation of all claimed criteria because two were waived. Eligible for a focused summary on awards/judging evidence and appeal waiver, with correct procedural caveat.

Editorial use note: Eligible for a focused summary on awards/judging evidence and appeal waiver, with correct procedural caveat.

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Awards research

  • Published material about the person research

  • Performance sector research

  • Teaching sector research

  • Final Merits research

  • Waiv research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for DEC202024_02B2203