AAO research
EB-1A motion disposition — AAO decision DEC192017_02B2203: Appeal dismissed; petition denied. Review source status, procedural posture and the official…
Decision summary: AAO decision DEC192017_02B2203: Appeal dismissed; petition denied. The review record does not provide a normalized explanation of the disposition. Consult the cited source pages.
Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.
Scope classification from review: in_scope_procedural_eb1a_decision. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | DEC192017_02B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | 2017-12-19 |
Classification / field stated in source | Classification not stated in the normalized review fields |
Procedural posture | AAO_posture: De novo appeal by attorney/mediator/journalist/author. AAO reviewed judging, authorship, and leading/critical-role criteria.; citation_pages: 1; 2; 3; 4; classification: AAO appeal/motion as described in source; director_findings: De novo appeal by attorney/mediator/journalist/author. AAO reviewed judging, authorship, and leading/critical-role criteria. |
Operative disposition | {'outcome': 'Appeal dismissed; petition denied.', 'basis': 'Article authorship criterion was met, but evidence did not show judging of others’ work or a leading/critical role for a distinguished organization; fewer than three criteria were established. (pp. 2–4)', 'citation_pages': [1, 2, 3, 4]} |
Final-merits status | Threshold criterion count not met; no final-merits determination. |
What the AAO decision addressed
The review record does not provide a normalized explanation of the disposition. Consult the cited source pages.
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | Not reached — source PDF |
Membership | Not reached — source PDF |
Published material about the person | Not reached — source PDF |
Judging the work of others | Not met — source PDF |
Original contributions of major significance | Not reached — source PDF |
Scholarly authorship | met — source PDF |
Artistic display or showcases | Not coded — source PDF |
Leading or critical role | Not met — source PDF |
High salary or remuneration | Not reached — source PDF |
Commercial success in the performing arts | Not reached — source PDF |
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: {'eligible_for_narrow_comparison': True, 'fit': 'Narrow comparison for differentiating mediation/evaluation duties from judging criterion, and volunteer service from leading/critical role.', 'caveats': 'Nonprecedent, fact-specific decision. Preserve posture and individual evidence; do not aggregate as a generalized rule.'}
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
Open the official USCIS decision PDF. Page-specific citations were not available in the normalized row.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.