AAO research
EB-1A judging the work of others — AAO decision DEC162021_01B2203: Appeal dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.
Decision summary: AAO decision DEC162021_01B2203: Appeal dismissed. The Director’s favorable judging and scholarly-authorship findings were affirmed. Original contributions and leading/critical role were not established; a salary claim raised for the first time on appeal was not considered. (pp. 2–8).
Source limitation: The review record contains a source hold or limitation. Read the limitation below before relying on any case detail; unresolved facts are not treated as findings.
Scope classification from review: in_scope_EB1A_source_reviewed. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | DEC162021_01B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | December 16, 2021 |
Classification / field stated in source | Sciences/medicine; infectious-disease clinician and physician-researcher |
Procedural posture | Appeal of Texas Service Center denial; AAO de novo review. |
Operative disposition | Appeal dismissed. |
Final-merits status | No final-merits determination because only two initial criteria were established; the decision additionally states that aggregate record did not show the required acclaim/top-of-field status. (pp. 8–9) |
What the AAO decision addressed
The Director’s favorable judging and scholarly-authorship findings were affirmed. Original contributions and leading/critical role were not established; a salary claim raised for the first time on appeal was not considered. (pp. 2–8)
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | Not coded — source PDF |
Membership | Not coded — source PDF |
Published material about the person | Not coded — source PDF |
Judging the work of others | met |
Original contributions of major significance | Not met — source PDF |
Scholarly authorship | met — source PDF |
Artistic display or showcases | Not coded — source PDF |
Leading or critical role | not met |
High salary or remuneration | Not considered — source PDF |
Commercial success in the performing arts | Not coded — source PDF |
Source holds and limits
The decision found the claimed causal link between the Beneficiary’s research and FDA/CDC policy changes was not supported by the chronology; keep this limitation prominent. (pp. 4–6)
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: A cited clinician-researcher explainer can distinguish publishing/citations and clinical duties from demonstrated field-wide change and organizational criticality.
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
Open the official USCIS decision PDF. Page-specific citations were not available in the normalized row.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Judging the work of others research
Leading or critical role research
Medicine sector research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.